Trustees for the Employees Retirement System of Texas voted Wednesday to decrease earnings assumptions for its $26 billion trust fund, a rare move that could have major implications for the state budget and the retirement systems beneficiaries.

In a 4-2 vote, the board cut the funds expected annual rate of return from 8 percent to 7.5 percent, reflecting gloomier market conditions and other factors straining the system. The board also voted to revisit the rate in two years.

Agency staffers and some trustees had pushed for a rate as low as 7 or 7.25 percent, but the board settled on the slightly higher projection.

Retirees and advocates fear the Legislature will respond by shifting more financial burdens onto the systems beneficiaries, either by forcing current employees to chip in more for their future pensions, cutting benefits or closing off the fund to future retirees.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

The Employees Retirement System handles benefits for about 240,000 active and retired state employees, elected officials, law enforcement and prison officers and judges. On average, beneficiaries receive $1,600 per month, a figure that hasnt been adjusted for the soaring cost of living since 2001.

Lowering the expected rate of return will not affect how much money flows into the retirement system, but it will dramatically alter its long-term balance sheet.

Under current assumptions, the fund is projected to grow large enough tocover its liabilities within 35 years.Under a 7.5 percent expected rate of return, the fund would never be expected to grow large enough to provide full benefits to retirees into the future, and without intervention, would be depleted by 2070.

Retirees in recent weeks flooded trustees with emails expressing anxieties about their future benefits and urging trustees to protect the status quo on expected rates of return. Several voiced their concerns in public comments ahead of Wednesdays vote.

I have nothing to lose but retirement money, said Pamela Scott, a retiree who spent 17 years working for the formerly named Texas Commission for the Blind and saw her salary peak at $31,000.We were promised when I went to work: Yes, our salaries are low, but youd have good benefits and good retirement.

Trustees said they understood retirees concerns, and they were only lowering expectations to protect the long-term health of the system.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Craig Hester, an investment manager and the boards chair, described a perfect storm of factors putting pressure on the retirement system over the past two decades, including a national recession, an aging workforce, benefits changes and chronic legislative underfunding.

A host of other states have recently lowered their predicted rates of return for public pension funds, a change some financial analysts say is needed, largely because low interest rates have limited earnings for the type of low-risk investments that pension funds generally favor.

Hester and other trustees agreed that the Legislature had shortchanged the retirement systems fund and Texas workers more broadly over the years and could struggle to recruit talent if they fail to boost salaries or benefits.

We would all agree that the people who have sacrificed for the state have never been fairly compensated, said Cydney Donnell, a trustee. You need to be at the Legislature voicing concerns.

Donnell said she doubted that current retirees would be affected by any looming adjustments to benefits.

I think their anxiety should be reduced, she said. I think most people who are really going to be impacted by it are in the longer term.

Texas tended to fully fund the Employees Retirement System throughout the 1990s. But a turn-of-the-century recession triggered a long streak of chronic legislative underfunding that strained the system. In 2015, lawmakers sought to shore up the retirement systemby increasing state and employee contributions by roughly 2 percent each.

Texas law says state pension funds cant adjust for cost of living unless the funds are actuarially sound that is, they have enough money available to cover all liabilities even after increasing retiree payments. Even under an earnings projection of 8 percent, that wouldnt have happened for 35 years.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Labor advocates have pushing for a lump-sum cash infusion that could more backfill plug the funding gap and potentially allow for the cost-of-living adjustment. But even that could be tricky.

The Texas Constitution says the state's contributions to pension funds cant eclipse 10 percent, and the state is near that threshold. Legal experts disagree about whether such an infusion would count toward pushing Texas over that cap, and the idea is a nonstarter around the Capitol.

There is one other option: Gov.Greg Abbottcould declare the unfunded liability an emergency, giving lawmakers clear permission to chip in more money.

Donnell said suggested lawmakers would be wise to chip in resources sooner than later, so they could grow over time.

Small check now, big check later, she said. If they dont put money into the system now, it doesnt earn anything.

Read related Tribune coverage:

The Employees Retirement System of Texas is considering lowering its earnings assumption for the $26 billion trust fund. Labor advocates fear the move would push lawmakers to cut benefits or require current workers to chip in more. [Full story]

Advocates for state employees hope that lawmakers approve substantial pay raises including for state workers who don't work at an agency that's facing a high-profile crisis. [Full story]

The House unanimously approved a Dallas pension bill aimed at preventing first responders' retirement fund from becoming insolvent within a decade. [Full story]

Read more here:
Employees Retirement System of Texas lowers expectations, worrying workers - Texas Tribune