Nick Wagoner, ESPN Staff WriterApr 10, 2024, 07:19 PM ET

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Stanford women's basketball coach Tara VanDerveer had flirted with retirement several times before, but she never thought she'd quite be ready to walk away from the job with which she has become synonymous for the better part of the past four decades.

Yet there VanDerveer sat at Stanford's Arrillaga Family Sports Center on Wednesday afternoon, spending roughly 45 minutes answering questions, telling stories and recounting the highs and lows of a legendary career in which she became the NCAA's winningest basketball coach with 1,216 victories at Stanford, Ohio State and Idaho, three national championships and 14 Final Fours at Stanford.

Stanford announced VanDerveer's decision to retire Tuesday night, adding that she will remain affiliated with the university in an advisory role and that Kate Paye, VanDerveer's longtime assistant and former player, was in the middle of negotiations to replace her. VanDerveer's retirement from the coaching position will become official May 8, which will mark exactly 39 years since she was hired as the Cardinal's coach.

2 Related

"After every year I really evaluate it, I've probably retired at least 20 times in my mind," VanDerveer said. "I just felt I'm ready. I never really thought I would be. I just felt like maybe I would just keel over on the bench because I love it. ... It kind of just came together."

For VanDerveer, it all came together after a season in which she didn't necessarily know it would be her last but checked plenty of boxes if it was going to be, especially with the diminishment of the Pac-12.

But even with the Pac-12's disintegration and Stanford poised to move to the Atlantic Coast Conference next year, a move that will come with a taxing travel schedule, VanDerveer emphasized that didn't play a role in her decision to step away.

"I want to just say that it has nothing to do with going into the ACC," VanDerveer said. "Really, that was a motivator to want to stay, to play that competition because I think it's going to be a great, great league."

According to VanDerveer, the motto for the 2023-24 Cardinal was simply "best year ever," and she was motivated to make it just that.

Along the way, she surpassed Mike Krzyzewski's NCAA record of 1,202 wins Jan. 21 and, more important, coached a team that ranked in the top 10 most of the year before bowing out in the Sweet 16.

As VanDerveer and her team walked off the Maples Pavilion court following a round of 32 overtime win against Iowa State, she allowed herself to ponder the idea that if it was her last game on the sidelines in Palo Alto, it was a fun way to go out.

According to some of her players, VanDerveer had made a habit throughout the season of savoring every moment. It was, perhaps, a clue that retirement might be forthcoming, but nobody was certain.

After Stanford's 77-67 loss to NC State in the Sweet 16, VanDerveer said she did what she usually does, taking some time to assess where she stood and if she wanted to continue. During that period of reflection, VanDerveer considered the amount of work and dedication it took to succeed at her job.

The thoughts struck a similar tone to 10 years ago, when VanDerveer said she came closest to walking away as she struggled with exhaustion. At a dinner with longtime Stanford supporter John Arrillaga and with the blessing of athletics director Bernard Muir, VanDerveer agreed to return but with the caveat that she would need the summer off.

This time, though, VanDerveer thought of playing bridge with her 97-year-old mother, Rita, and the opportunity to go water skiing and sailing without having to worry about the recruiting or any of the many other endless responsibilities of coaching.

Ultimately, VanDerveer decided she couldn't give her all around the clock anymore. She informed the school of her retirement Tuesday night and called her mother before the news broke.

"It's a bittersweet moment," senior guard Hannah Jump said. "I'm very happy for her and everything she's accomplished and all the lives and relationships she has kind of touched here. But also, it's sad. She had such an impact on this sport and all of our lives as well."

Stanford has not yet formally announced Paye as VanDerveer's successor, but all sides are aiming for that to happen sooner than later. Paye played for VanDerveer from 1991 to 1995 and has been on Stanford's staff for the past 17 seasons, during which she emerged as the obvious choice to one day step into the lead job.

On Wednesday, VanDerveer called Paye her "security blanket," and noted that Paye has paid her dues, passing up other head-coaching opportunities to wait her turn in Palo Alto. Now that time is near, and Paye acknowledged Wednesday the challenge that comes with replacing a legend.

"Tara is one of one," Paye said. "That's plain and simple. Nobody could ever replace her or duplicate her."

Paye said that while there will be plenty of change for the program in the next year, she expects to retain the coaching staff as she hopes to "lean into continuity."

And, as Paye and the Stanford program forge a new path, VanDerveer won't be far away. While VanDerveer is looking forward to doing the things her life in basketball have kept her from doing, she said she has more to contribute to the athletic program, whether that's as an ambassador or in an advisory role in which she helps coach other coaches.

"I want to be involved," VanDerveer said. "But it'll be a balance. When you're a coach ... You're on 24/7, and I'm ready for maybe just the seven, not the 24."

VanDerveer's retirement comes at a time when a handful of some of the most successful coaches in sports have also walked away from high-profile jobs, if not retired altogether. Former Alabama football coach Nick Saban retired after winning seven national championships. Former New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick did the same after winning six Super Bowls.

But VanDerveer is also walking away at a time when women's college basketball is thriving at previously unmatched levels. Sunday's NCAA championship game between Iowa Hawkeyes and South Carolina Gamecocks averaged 18.7 million viewers, besting the men's final by nearly four million average viewers, and marking the first time the women's final has drawn a larger number than the men.

While none of that seemed factor into VanDerveer's decision to stay or go, she said it will help her walk away at peace with her choice.

"The support for women's basketball is just growing, and for basketball in general, it's very, very exciting," VanDerveer said. "I feel like I'm leaving it in a good place."

Read the original here:
Stanford's Tara VanDerveer on retirement -- 'Just felt I'm ready' - ESPN

Updated at 5:37 p.m. ET

The House Oversight and Accountability Committee on Wednesday advanced legislation aimed at preventing improper payments in the employer-sponsored health insurance program for federal workers, as well as to ensure roughly 1,200 U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers receive the enhanced retirement benefits they were promised.

In 2022, the Government Accountability Office issued a report finding that the federal government needs to do more to ensure enrollees in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, which provides health insurance to roughly 8 million federal employees, retirees and their families, are eligible for the benefits.

Although the Office of Personnel Management in recent years has issued guidance instructing agencies and insurance carriers to verify the eligibility of family members, GAO argued that the agency should do more, such as its own monitoring program or audit, something OPM has argued is too cost-prohibitive with its current resources. The OPM inspector general has speculated that FEHBP could be improperly providing benefits within the range of $500 million to $3 billion annually.

The FEHB Protection Act (H.R. 7868), introduced by Rep. Michael Waltz, R-Fla., requires federal agencies to verify the eligibility of family members of federal workers for the program, i.e. that spouses are married to the employee and children are under the age of 26. It also requires OPM to conduct an audit of the current insure rolls to ensure their continued eligibility, as well as for OPM to incorporate a review of the issue as part of its fraud risk assessment of FEHBP.

It is unfortunate that OPM is still unable to ensure that employing offices are executing basic verification requirements, and its unacceptable, Waltz said Wednesday. The American people deserve to know that the tax dollars they earn are spent appropriately and free from fraud and waste.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the committees ranking member, sought unsuccessfully to amend the bill to include language that would authorize additional funding go to OPM to cover the cost of the audit, but Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., expressed a willingness to amend the bill before it reaches the House floor authorizing a specific dollar figure, based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office. The CBO does not score legislation until it has advanced out of committee.

In a statement, OPM said that it is committed to ensuring FEHBP is administered efficiently and preventing improper payments.

"OPM remains committed to address improper enrollments in the FEHB program and finding solutions within our current resources," an agency spokesperson said. "We continue to emphasize to Congress that additional investment is required to support our efforts to reduce waste, fraud and abuse within the FEHB program and hte critical role that agencies and carriers play in this effort."

The bill advanced by a 37-6 vote.

Fixing a CBP Retirement Foul-up

The panel also voted unanimously to advance legislation aimed at fixing a more than decade-old mistake by U.S. Customs and Border Protection that misled around 1,200 CBP officers about their retirement benefits.

In 2008, CBP implemented a law making CBP officers eligible for enhanced retirement benefits to make up for the fact that they are required to retire at age 57, provided that they have 20 years of service and make larger retirement contributions. The law set up a transitional system for those hired before July 6, 2008, which provides the enhanced retirement annuity rate despite the fact that they would not have reached 20 years of service before their mandatory retirement rate.

But the agency mistakenly told officers who were given job offers before July 6, 2008 but did not start work until afterward that they also would be eligible for the enhanced benefits. It wasnt until 2020 that CBP realized its mistake and rescinded those enhanced benefits, despite the fact that those 1,200 employees had paid more from their paychecks toward their Federal Employees Retirement System annuity than they otherwise would have for over a decade.

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection Officer Retirement Corrections Act (H.R. 7869), introduced by Rep. Ryan Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., would restore those enhanced benefits to CBP officers affected by their agencys mistake.

Since these officers planned their retirement, their lives and careers around incorrect guidance given to them by CBP, this bill corrects the misunderstanding by providing the enhanced benefits to this small group in the same way as existing officers, as they were told at the time, Comer said. It also directs GAO to report on the proper management of this benefit to prevent similar mistakes from occurring in the future.

Both bills may now head to the floor for consideration by the full House.

Continued here:
House panel advances bills to improve FEHBP oversight and fix CBP retirement snafu - Government Executive

The Office of Personnel Management continued its rapid pace processing the annual deluge of early-year retirement claims, completing more than 10,000 requests for the second straight month.

OPM processed 10,711 retirement requests in March, an increase of nearly 700 claims over the previous month, and nearly 1,800 more than the same period a year ago. Combined with the number of new claims continuing its descent since Januarys high-water mark of 12,997 to 7,943 last month, the overall backlog of pending claims fell from 19,591 in February to 16,823 last month.

That figure is a marked improvement over 2023, when OPMs retirement backlog did not fall below 17,000 until June. At the end of March 2023, the backlog still sat at 22,925 pending claims. OPMs target steady state of pending claims at any given time is 13,000.

Despite those gains, the average processing time for retirement claims measured on a monthly basis ticked up, from 47 days in February to 55 days last month. An overall average, measured since the fiscal year began in October, was 61 days as of the end of March, a slight improvement from the average 62 days measured the previous month.

For years, OPMs retirement process has been embattled by complaints of opacity and sluggishness. Although a major reformdigitizing the process and federal personnel recordsremains in development, a number of short-term fixes appear to have borne fruit amid this years retirement rush.

The agency has devoted additional staff and work hours to processing claims, while leadership has published a series of guides and checklists to both help federal workers better understand the process, including which agency is responsible for which phase, as well as to help them avoid common pitfalls when filling out the application, which is the biggest cause of processing delays.

View original post here:
OPM continued to make strides on retirement process in March - Government Executive

As the highly anticipated showdown between Canelo Alvarez and Jaime Munguia approaches on May 4 in Las Vegas, the Mexican boxing superstar has once again opened up about his future in the sport. Contrary to retirement rumors, Canelo reveals that he is not yet ready to hang up his gloves and even entertains the possibility of a trilogy against Munguia.

In a recent interview with Azteca Deportes, Canelo expressed his willingness to continue fighting for several more years, citing his current physical condition as optimal for continued success in the ring. This statement offers a glimmer of hope to fans who eagerly anticipate witnessing Canelo's legendary career unfold for years to come.

"Yes, I feel very good, in my best moment," Canelo said.

"I think I'll be here for three or four more years. Maybe sooner, we don't know. It's all in how I feel, until I say 'Yeah, I'm going to dedicate myself to my business'.

"But I still love and enjoy what I do and I'm going to go fight after fight and as long as I stay like this, as you see it now in the gym, we won't know how many more years. There's still plenty to give and give away, yes."

Meanwhile, amidst the buzz surrounding Canelo's upcoming fight, fellow boxer Ryan Garcia took the opportunity to weigh in on the choice of Munguia as Canelo's opponent.

While Garcia has faced his own challenges in recent weeks, he offered insights into Canelo's decision-making process, shedding light on the strategic considerations behind the matchup.

"I think Canelo took that fight because [Munguia] is a less dangerous version of [David] Benavidez]," Garcia said.

"He's very tall, he throws a lot of punches, but he's not as good as Benavidez. I think this is a way for Canelo to test himself before making the decision to fight David. Maybe."

View original post here:
Canelo talks once again about his retirement and does not rule out a trilogy against Munguia - Marca English

For Vadaire James, a wellness counselor from Winston-Salem, N.C., being single is fine especially right now while she is helping care for her octogenarian parents.

What nags at her, though, is what her life will look like when shes their age.

I moved here six years ago from Washington, D.C., to help support my parents, and since then, my retirement saving priorities have taken a bit of a back burner, the 51-year-old told Yahoo Finance. I feel like I'm way behind the eight ball right now, and I don't feel comfortable at all about what my future might look like.

In 2022, there were 43.5 million single adult women in the US, up from 37 million a decade earlier, according to the most recent figures from the US Census Bureau. Thats the highest level ever and for many of them, like James, the risk of running out of money in retirement is a serious concern.

Heres why single women are uniquely vulnerable: Its the combination of potentially longer life spans and the persistent pay gap when compared to their male peers, along with fewer years in the workforce due to timeout for caregiving all without the fallback of a partners income to rely on.

Single women dont have anybody else to lean on but themselves when it comes to their money, said Cindy Hounsell, president of the advocacy group Women's Institute for a Secure Retirement (WISER).

Now, several new research reports are shedding light on the precarious state of their financial security and retirement savings.

Lets start with the pay gap women in the US earn $0.84 for every $1 earned by men, according to the National Womens Law Center.

That, in turn, translates to less money available to set aside in retirement funds. Many women also tend to take time out of the workforce for caregiving of children and family members, which often means a pause in contributions to retirement accounts. That, combined with the pay issue, results in lower future Social Security checks.

Story continues

According to the Social Security Administration, the average monthly retirement benefit for retired men age 65 and older was $2,020 in 2022, and for retired women of the same age, it was $1,638.

In addition, about a quarter of women workers are not offered any retirement benefits by their employers, compared with only 16% of men, according to a 2023 Transamerica Institute report. That discrepancy is due in part to the fact that women are twice as likely as men to work in part-time contract jobs and many employers dont offer retirement benefits to their part-time employees.

The challenge is even greater considering that women tend to live longer than men nearly six years longer, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That means women must get by for longer on far less.

See related story: Retirement planning: A step-by-step guide

Among women and men who have never been married, the wealth gap is notable, according to a recent analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. The research focused on the segment (23%) of adults who have never been married, which strips out any outside sources of wealth that could come from being divorced or widowed.

In 2022, never-married women had $19,200 in inflation-adjusted median household wealth, and men in that group had $28,100. These women had $0.68 for every dollar of wealth owned by the men much wider than the broader gender income gap, which stood at $0.90.

The data reveals racial disparities among women as well. Never-married white women had a median $31,000 in wealth, almost 10 times the amount owned by their Black counterparts. Median wealth for never-married white men stood at $40,000.

An early start to retirement savings makes a big difference, but for many women in their 20s, debt can be a stumbling block to getting started.

Women hold an average of $31,276 in student debt, leaving them with a monthly loan payment of $307 the year after graduation.

In fact, women take about two years longer than men to repay student loans, according to an American Association of University Womens analysis. The reason: smaller salaries than their male counterparts. From the moment women graduate from college, most face a gender pay gap which widens as they age.

The upshot is that some women may put off saving for retirement, and even delaying by a few years can make a difference decades down the road when you consider the power of compounding interest and reinvested dividends.

Hounsell added that many single women figure they will just work longer if they are behind on savings. "But you might not be able to work as long as you expect, she said.

Read more: Tips for quickly paying off student loans

Caregiving is a key challenge. Overall, women are more than twice as likely as men to leave the workforce for more than one year to care for children or aging parents, according to new research, Challenges Women Face Saving for Retirement, from Goldman Sachs.

The data found that 40% of working women reported leaving their jobs for caregiving needs (childcare and eldercare), and 21% reported leaving a full-time job for part-time work to provide caregiving.

"Single women may have to step away from a job if they're going to help their parents, Kimberlee Davis, author of The Fiscal Feminist: A Financial Wake-Up Call for Women, told Yahoo Finance. And that could be really detrimental to them because they're the only game in town for saving for their retirement.

Women are programmed to be caregivers, and they also are programmed to put others ahead of themselves at their own financial risk, she said. And at some point, we need to learn that we have to be a little bit more selfish.

Her tip: Women who have enough income should start a taxable brokerage account and make it an automated investment. Whether it's only $250 a month, a hundred dollars a month, it's to get that habit going and get that feeling of seeing your account grow, Davis said. Because taxable accounts are as important as retirement accounts.

Only a quarter of single women have a retirement account vs. half of married women, according to New York Life Wealth Watch data. And two-thirds are not confident that their retirement savings will last the rest of their life. At the same time, 6 in 10 feel very knowledgeable or somewhat knowledgeable about saving for retirement.

James is in that knowledgeable crew now.I needed to make changes in my job so I could be with my parents, and it has been nice, even if they can be a handful, she said.

Her decision meant a significant drop in salary, but she hasnt stopped saving in her retirement account. I add money every month, although I waver on how much I'm able to do, she said. If my income was greater, of course, I would put more aside.

She admits she holds a lingering regret. I remember when I was 21, and my mom sat me down and said, If you put money in a retirement account now, this is how much itll be when you're 30, 40, 50, 60. Of course, that went in one ear and out the other, and while I have saved over the years, it has been inconsistent. I look back on it now and wish I would've taken her advice.

Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist, and the author of 14 books, including "In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in The New World of Work" and "Never Too Old To Get Rich." Follow her on X @kerryhannon.

Click here for the latest personal finance news to help you with investing, paying off debt, buying a home, retirement, and more

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Link:
For women who stay single, the pressure is higher to save more for retirement - Yahoo Finance

Colony Retirement Homes III in Worcester has been granted $8 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development under the departments Green and Resilient Retrofit Program, which issues direct loans and grants to support a variety of green initiatives for eligible HUD-assisted multifamily properties.

Colony III is one of four locations for Colony Retirement Homes and is a 100-apartment retirement living community offering affordable housing to low-income seniors, according to the nonprofits website.

Colony III will use the funds to help subsidize energy efficiency and climate resilience renovations for its apartments, according to a Thursday press release from the HUD.

The climate crisis and housing crisis are intertwined, Worcester Mayor Joseph Petty said in the release. Ensuring our housing stock is more efficient promotes better health outcomes for our community, including our seniors. We are incredibly grateful for the partnership we have with federal agencies like HUD and I look forward to these improvements.

The funding is provided by the federal Inflation Reduction Act, which issued $837 million to the climate resilience program. Awards provided are used for a number of eco-conscious initiatives such as projects to improve energy or water efficiency, enhance indoor air quality or sustainability, implement the use of zero-emission electricity generation, low-emission building materials or processes, energy storage, and building electrification strategies, according to HUDs website.

The senior living facility is one of 109 properties housing more than 12,600 households and individuals awarded HUD funds to address green and climate resilience efforts. As of March 28, the GRRP has administered $544 million in funding for such projects.

This funding from HUD is an incredible opportunity to make important sustainable renovations to Colony Retirement Homes III, Worcester City Manager Eric Batista said in the release. It is critical that all of our housing stock be outfitted with energy efficient and sustainable resources as we work toward meeting the goals of the Green Worcester Plan to holistically combat the climate crisis in our growing city.

Link:
Worcester retirement home receives $8M from HUD for green renovations - Worcester Business Journal

Above / Mayor Scott Wehrli, Naperville Police Chief Jason Arres, Officer Arzania Zook Williams, Park Police Chief Steve Schindlbeck and Park Board President Mary Gibson are pictured during recognition of Officer Zooks 40-year career of public service to Naperville. (Photo courtesy Naperville Park District)

During the April 11, 2024, park board meeting, Park Police Officer Arzania Williams, also known as Zook, was recognized for his trusted and knowledgeable service to the Naperville community as he officially retired.

Officer Williams began his career in law enforcement with the City of Naperville in the mid-1980s. For the last decade, he served as one of the Districts park police officers where he mentored young officers and brought a strong sense of camaraderie to the department.

Officer Williams was presented with a shadow box and a certificate of recognition from Board President Mary Gibson and Park Police Chief Steve Schindlbeck.

Mayor Scott Wehrli and Naperville Police Chief, Jason Arres, also recognized Officer Williams and presented him with the Meritorious Service Award, honoring his years of dedication and excellence as a Naperville police officer before he joined the Naperville Park District Police.

Regular board meetings are livestreamed and may be viewed via the Park Districts YouTube channel.

See the article here:
Naperville Park District recognizes Officer Arzania 'Zook' Williams upon his retirement - Positively Naperville

GREELEY, CO - NOVEMBER 18:The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, located at 1555 North 17th Ave., is seen as the sun sets in Greeley Nov. 18, 2021. (Alex McIntyre/Staff Photographer)

No Weld County Health Department retirees will see any reduced benefits after learning last month that they overpaid into their pension fund.

Just over 20 retirees affected found out late last week that there will be no impact to their retirement benefits moving forward despite an accounting error made by previous staff, according to the county.

Public Employees Retirement Association Senior Communications Director Patrick Von Keyserling said that since both the county and the retirees made contributions, there is no harm to the pension fund moving forward, and the 22 retirees affected by the mistake will not see any change to retirement benefits.

Along with the retirees, the error affected an additional 110 current and former employees, Weld County Chief Financial Officer Cheryl Pattelli said. Those employees should receive a refund for the excess payments in the coming weeks.

We are pleased with the outcome and appreciate the partnership with PERA, Pattelli said.

Through a survey performed late last year, PERA discovered an issue with how the county handled pre-tax deductions for employees who were PERA members on or before June 30, 2019.

Pattelli said the county had not taken out pre-tax deductions from Section 125 benefits for the affected employees salaries when calculating retirement benefits. It resulted in overstating employees salaries to PERA and the employees and the county paying more into the retirement fund than required.

Money placed in Section 125 flexible spending accounts, other than contributions to health savings accounts, arent considered salary for PERA purposes for those whose membership began on or before June 30, 2019. For those who began membership after that date, contributions to such accounts are includable, according to the PERA website.

Staff do not know how the error occurred, because it occurred before the current staffs tenure, according to the county.

More:
Weld Health Department retirees to see no change to retirement benefits - Greeley Tribune

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley announced Thursday she would step down at the end of her term next spring, putting liberals' majority on the pivotal swing states highest bench at stake.

The April 2025 election to replace Bradley promises to be an expensive and bitter race and will likely feature many of the same momentous issues like abortion rights and redistricting that defined a 2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court race that ultimately gave liberals their first majority on the bench in 15 years.

In a statement, Bradley, 73, said she would not run for a fourth 10-year term on the court, saying it was a good time to bring fresh perspectives to the court.

My decision has not come lightly. It is made after careful consideration and reflection. I know I can do the job and do it well. I know I can win re-election should I run, but its just time to pass the torch, wrote Bradley, who was elected to the technically nonpartisan court in 1995.

The election for Bradley's seat will come two years after liberal Janet Protasiewicz defeated conservative Dan Kelly in what was the most expensive state Supreme Court race in U.S. history and one of the most closely watched elections of 2023.

The race was largely defined by Protasiewiczs support for abortion rights and opposition to the states heavily gerrymandered legislative maps two issues that were set to come before the court. During the campaign, conservatives criticized Protasiewicz for having taken public stances on divisive political issues. Following her win, some Republicans in the state threatened her with impeachment.

Just days after Protasiewicz was sworn in, the court took up the case of the state's legislative maps and months later ruled them unconstitutional. The new maps that were drawn are all but certain to cut down on the GOPs majority in the Legislature this November.

Wisconsin Democrats promptly praised Bradley on Thursday for her tenure, but also warned of how much was at stake if conservatives were to retake the majority especially on the issue of abortion in the state, where, following the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022, a 175-year-old near-total ban technically went back into effect.

Theres no question that reproductive freedom and abortion bans in Wisconsin will be a central issue not just this fall, but also in the Supreme Court race next spring, Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler said on a call with reporters. The far right is trying to take over the Supreme Court so that they can put the 1849 abortion ban into effect.

Justice Ann Walsh Bradleys announcement this morning that she wont be running for re-election next year is a reminder that Wisconsin is still only one bad election away from an ultra-right wing, abortion banning Supreme Court majority, he added.

The Biden campaign praised Bradley and argued that "with her decision not to seek reelection, the future of reproductive rights in Wisconsin is once again in flux."

"As Donald Trump brags about overturning Roe and enabling extreme state abortion bans across the country, its clear that the surest way voters can protect their abortion rights in Wisconsin is to reelect President Joe Biden this November," the campaign's Wisconsin communications director, Brianna Johnson, said in a statement Thursday.

The race will have huge political ramifications in the battleground state.

Democrats in the state had viewed the new court majority as a prime opportunity to break the GOP's yearslong grip on power and policy. But another election with the majority again at stake could scramble those hopes.

It's also likely to further ratchet up existing tensions on the court.

While the Wisconsin Supreme Court has been plagued by acrimony, divisions and allegations of partisanship for years, the 2023 election and the flip in ideological balance on the bench following it caused those tensions to erupt anew into public view.

Protasiewiczs first few weeks on the court were marred by sudden personnel moves overseen by the courts new liberal majority, rancorous news releases and tweets by justices that included insults and accusations of partisanship.

Adam Edelman is a political reporter for NBC News.

Sarah Dean and Megan Lebowitz contributed.

See original here:
Wisconsin Supreme Court justice to retire, putting liberals' majority at stake next year - NBC News

Sebastian Vettel has made the headlines in recent weeks after admitting that a Formula 1 comeback could be appealing for 2025. But how many other drivers have ended their retirements to return to the sport over the years and, more importantly, how did they fare? Weve put together a shortlist

Niki Lauda initially called time on his F1 career at the 1979 Canadian Grand Prix, where he told Brabham team boss Bernie Ecclestone that he no longer wanted to drive in circles instead ploughing his energy into getting his own airline business off the ground.

READ MORE: 10 of the most remarkable injury comebacks in F1 history

But a few years on, McLaren and sponsor Marlboro dangled the carrot of an F1 return and the chance to add to the two world titles he had achieved with Ferrari in the 1970s in front of the Austrian, and it was an opportunity he grabbed.

After a brace of wins in 1982 and a couple more podiums in 1983, McLaren delivered the rapid, Porsche-powered MP4/2 for 1984, in which Lauda managed to pip team mate and rising star Alain Prost to the title by half a point.

Lauda continued for one more season, taking his 25th and final win at the 1985 Dutch Grand Prix, before embarking on a range of consultancy and managerial roles with Ferrari, Jaguar and most recently Mercedes, where he remained until his passing in 2019.

Alan Jones made his F1 debut in the mid-1970s and, some five years later, had reached the heights of title glory with Williams becoming only the second Australian driver to achieve the feat after triple world champion Jack Brabham.

Having come close to doubling up in 1981, placing third in the standings behind team mate Carlos Reutemann and Brabhams eventual title winner Nelson Piquet, AJ decided that hed had enough of travelling around the world and announced his retirement.

BEYOND THE GRID: 1980 World Champion Alan Jones on racing and winning for Williams

Victory in his then final race at Caesars Palace was a fine way to bow out, only for Jones to return to action little more than a year later with Arrows, despite breaking his leg in a horse-riding accident. However, when sponsorship money failed to materialise the two parties went their separate ways, having started just one Grand Prix together.

Some three years later, Jones returned full-time with Haas, but the regular podiums and wins from his initial stint in F1 were swapped for regular retirements a P4 finish in Austria and P6 result in Italy the two highlights from an otherwise painful 1986. He retired again thereafter.

Nigel Mansell realised his long-held ambition of becoming F1 world champion with Williams and their all-conquering FW14B in 1992, but no sooner had the Briton put his hands on that coveted prize, he departed the team and the sport as a whole.

Indeed, after falling out with team chiefs Frank Williams and Patrick Head over the terms of a new deal, and the impending arrival of Prost (with whom hed experienced a tense relationship at Ferrari), Mansell opted for a move to America and the Indy Car World Series.

READ MORE: 5 bold F1 driver moves that paid off and 5 that didnt

A year later, and with the CART title also under his belt, Mansell returned to F1 and Williams following Ayrton Sennas death, making several appearances through 1994 and scoring a pole position/victory double at the season finale in Adelaide only for Williams to give David Coulthard a full-time drive alongside Damon Hill in 1995.

Mansell subsequently headed to another legendary British team in McLaren, but having struggled to fit into the narrow MP4/10B and missing the start of the season, he could not get to grips with the car when he eventually sat behind the wheel and permanently retired after two challenging race weekends.

After Brawn GPs sensational title double in 2009, it was all change at the Brackley team for 2010 as German automotive giant Mercedes bought the operation and signalled their full-time return to F1 competition with a view to emulating their success from the 1950s.

Neither Jenson Button (heading to McLaren) nor Rubens Barrichello (moving to Williams) would represent the marque, though, with team bosses instead signing an all-German line-up of Nico Rosberg and returning world champion Michael Schumacher.

READ MORE: Today was a little present to myself The story of Michael Schumacher's 91st and final F1 win

Schumacher, who had racked up a pair of titles with Benetton in the 1990s and five with Ferrari in the noughties, was keen to add another chapter of success to his F1 story, but while a three-year spell with the Silver Arrows brought plenty of points, it yielded just one podium finish.

Schumacher was, however, credited with helping to lay the foundations for Mercedes success in the turbo-hybrid era that followed the team winning eight constructors titles and seven drivers titles from 2014 to 2021.

While it was not officially announced as a retirement at the time, Kimi Raikkonen stepped away from the F1 grid at the end of a challenging 2009 season with Ferrari, despite having a contract to race with the team who signed Fernando Alonso in his place through 2010.

Over the next couple of years, the Finn dabbled in his passion for mixed-surface competition with outings in the World Rally Championship and also sampled the world of NASCAR, but the F1 paddock remained interested in his services and he returned with Lotus for 2012.

WATCH: I just did whatever made me happy Take an animated trip through Kimi Raikkonens stellar career

A brilliant victory and radio message followed at that years Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, before he kicked off the 2013 campaign with a similarly impressive win in Australia. After bagging several more podiums, Raikkonen soon found himself heading back to the squad he had left in Ferrari.

While Raikkonens next spell at Maranello was not as successful as his first, which included a run to the title in 2007, he added plenty more trophies to his cabinet and took a very popular 21st and final victory at the 2018 United States Grand Prix, before embarking on a farewell stint with Alfa Romeo.

Alonso came agonisingly close to winning the title with Ferrari after replacing Raikkonen but with the top prize remaining elusive across a five-year spell in red he made a return to McLaren for 2015, where matters went from bad to worse thanks to an ailing Honda power unit.

Alonso patiently waited for progress across three seasons powered by the Japanese manufacturer, and another when Renault stepped in as their replacement, but with no sign of the race and title-contending form he had been craving, the Spaniard walked away from F1.

READ MORE: From Hungary 2003 to Spain 2013 Ranking Alonsos best wins from 10 to 1

Like Raikkonen, Alonso tried a host of different categories in the years that followed, with highlights including a pair of victories at the 24 Hours of Le Mans and the overall World Endurance Championship title, alongside outings in the IMSA SportsCar Championship, the Dakar Rally and the Indianapolis 500.

Alonso was then tempted back to F1 by Alpine, or Team Enstone, where he won his pair of world titles in 2005 and 2006, with a move to Aston Martin and a move up the grid soon following as his quest for that third championship continues.

What's more the Spaniard has just signed on at Aston Martin through to 2026, with chapters of his F1 journey still to be written.

Read the original post:
The drivers Vettel could follow by coming out of retirement - Formula 1