May 9, 2024 by Diana Ambolis

241

Ethereum, the worlds second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, is a powerful blockchain platform that fuels a vast ecosystem of decentralized applications (dApps) and digital assets known as tokens. However, a looming cloud of uncertainty hangs over this innovative landscape: government regulation. The Rise of Ethereum and its Tokenized Ecosystem Ethereums programmable blockchain allows developers to

Ethereum, the worlds second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, is a powerful blockchain platform that fuels a vast ecosystem of decentralized applications (dApps) and digital assets known as tokens. However, a looming cloud of uncertainty hangs over this innovative landscape: government regulation.

The Rise of Ethereum and its Tokenized Ecosystem

Ethereums programmable blockchain allows developers to create smart contracts, self-executing agreements that power dApps in various sectors, from finance (DeFi) to gaming (NFTs). These dApps often rely on Ethereum tokens, digital units with specific functionalities within their respective ecosystems.

Ethereum, the second-largest blockchain by market capitalization, faces a complex challenge: fostering innovation while navigating an uncertain regulatory landscape. Heres a closer look at this tightrope walk:

The Allure of Innovation:

Smart Contracts and dApps: Ethereums programmability allows for the creation of smart contracts (self-executing agreements) and decentralized applications (dApps) that revolutionize various industries, from finance (DeFi) to supply chain management.

Open Source and Decentralized: Ethereums open-source nature fosters a vibrant developer community that continuously pushes the boundaries of blockchain technology. Decentralization is a core principle, aiming to distribute power and control away from centralized authorities.

A Breeding Ground for New Ideas: The permissionless nature of Ethereum allows anyone to build upon it, fostering experimentation and the exploration of groundbreaking concepts like DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations).

The Challenge of Regulation:

Uncertain Regulatory Landscape: Regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology are still evolving globally. This uncertainty creates challenges for businesses and developers building on Ethereum, as compliance requirements remain unclear.

Concerns About Security and Scams: The anonymity associated with cryptocurrency transactions raises concerns from regulators about money laundering and illegal activities. Additionally, some DeFi projects on Ethereum have been susceptible to hacks and scams, highlighting the need for potential regulations to protect investors.

The Howey Test and Classification: The Howey Test, a legal framework in the US, classifies investment contracts as securities. Some regulators are scrutinizing whether certain Ethereum-based projects might fall under this category, potentially triggering stricter regulations.

Finding the Balance:

Self-Regulation Efforts: The Ethereum community is actively exploring self-regulation initiatives to address concerns about security and scams. These efforts demonstrate a commitment to responsible innovation within the ecosystem.

Collaboration with Regulators: Open dialogue and collaboration between the Ethereum community and regulatory bodies are crucial for establishing clear and workable regulations that foster innovation while mitigating risks.

Technological Solutions: The development of tools and technologies that enhance transparency and accountability on the Ethereum network can help address regulatory concerns without compromising decentralization principles.

Also, read Your Ultimate Guide To Blockchain Powered Data Exchange And Its Top 5 Benefits

The ever-evolving regulatory landscape surrounding Ethereum can be daunting for both developers and investors. Here are some strategies to navigate this uncertainty:

For Developers:

Stay Informed: Keep yourself updated on the latest regulatory developments related to cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. Resources like industry publications, legal forums, and conferences can be helpful.

Focus on Building Compliant Applications: While maintaining core decentralization principles, consider incorporating features that enhance transparency and accountability within your dApps. This could involve implementing Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures or collaborating with regulated entities.

Engage with Regulatory Bodies: Participate in discussions and contribute to shaping regulations. The Ethereum communitys voice can be influential in establishing fair and effective frameworks.

Consider Building Regulatory Compliance Tools: Theres a growing need for tools that help developers ensure their dApps comply with evolving regulations. Building such tools could be a valuable niche within the Ethereum ecosystem.

For Investors:

Conduct Thorough Due Diligence: Dont be swayed by hype. Research any Ethereum-based project youre considering investing in, understanding its underlying technology, purpose, and potential regulatory risks.

Diversify Your Portfolio: Spread your cryptocurrency investments across different assets, including established projects with strong track records. Avoid overexposure to highly speculative ventures.

Stay Up-to-Date on Legal Developments: Follow legal news related to specific projects or the broader cryptocurrency space. Understanding potential regulatory hurdles can inform your investment decisions.

Seek Professional Financial Advice: Consider consulting a financial advisor with expertise in cryptocurrency to navigate the complexities of this emerging asset class.

General Strategies:

Embrace Transparency: Both developers and investors should prioritize transparency in their activities. This fosters trust and can help mitigate regulatory concerns.

Prepare for Change: The regulatory environment is likely to remain fluid for some time. Be prepared to adapt your strategies as regulations evolve.

Advocate for Innovation: Support initiatives that promote responsible innovation within the Ethereum ecosystem, while ensuring regulatory compliance.

While the path forward is uncertain, staying informed, adapting to changing regulations, and prioritizing responsible development and investment practices will be key to success in the Ethereum ecosystem. By working together, developers, investors, and regulators can navigate this uncharted territory and unlock the full potential of Ethereums groundbreaking technology.

The question of how regulation will impact Ethereums future is a complex one. While regulations can stifle innovation, they can also bring much-needed clarity and legitimacy to the blockchain space. Heres a closer look at how regulation might even act as a catalyst for Ethereums growth:

Potential Benefits of Regulation:

Increased Investor Confidence: Clear and well-defined regulations can provide investors with more confidence in the Ethereum ecosystem. This could attract new institutional investors who might have previously been hesitant due to the uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrencies.

Reduced Risk of Scams and Fraud: Regulations aimed at combating money laundering and illegal activities could improve the overall security and stability of the Ethereum network. This would create a more trustworthy environment for users and developers.

A More Sustainable Ecosystem: Regulations could potentially address concerns about energy consumption associated with Proof-of-Work (PoW) mining, the current consensus mechanism used by Ethereum. This could encourage the adoption of more sustainable alternatives like Proof-of-Stake (PoS).

Mainstream Adoption and Integration: Regulatory frameworks that provide a path for compliance could lead to wider adoption of Ethereum by established financial institutions and businesses. This would integrate Ethereum technology into traditional financial systems, unlocking its potential for mainstream use cases.

A Catalyst for Innovation: Regulations can sometimes act as a catalyst for innovation. Developers might be spurred to create new solutions and applications that comply with regulations, further expanding the utility of the Ethereum network.

Challenges and Considerations:

Overly Restrictive Measures: Regulations that are overly restrictive could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of the Ethereum ecosystem. Finding the right balance between protecting investors and fostering innovation will be crucial. Striking this balance will require careful consideration of the potential consequences of regulations on the core principles of decentralization and technological advancement.

Maintaining Decentralization: Regulations that give too much control to central authorities could undermine the core principles of decentralization that underpin Ethereum. Striking a balance between regulation and decentralization will be a complex task. Regulatory frameworks need to be crafted in a way that safeguards users and promotes responsible development, without compromising the essence of a permissionless and distributed network.

Global Coordination Needed: The success of regulations will depend on a coordinated effort from governments around the world. A patchwork of regulations across different jurisdictions could create confusion and hinder global adoption of Ethereum technology. International collaboration among regulatory bodies will be essential to establish clear and consistent frameworks that promote responsible innovation on a global scale.

One of the major regulatory hurdles for Ethereum tokens is the Howey Test, a legal framework in the US that classifies investment contracts as securities. If certain Ethereum-based projects are deemed securities under the Howey Test, they might fall under stricter regulations akin to traditional stocks and bonds. This could significantly impact the development and operation of these projects.

Navigating the Uncertainty: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach

Despite the uncertainties, there are ways for Ethereum to navigate this complex regulatory landscape. Open dialogue and collaboration between the Ethereum community, regulatory bodies, and industry players are crucial. The Ethereum community can contribute by:

Regulatory Considerations for a Sustainable Future

For regulators, crafting effective frameworks requires a nuanced approach. Here are some key considerations:

The Road Ahead: A Potential Catalyst for Growth

While the immediate impact of regulation remains uncertain, its not all doom and gloom for Ethereum. Thoughtfully implemented regulations can bring several benefits:

A Collaborative Future for Ethereum

The future of Ethereum in the face of regulation hinges on a collaborative effort. The Ethereum community, regulators, and industry players all have a role to play. By fostering open communication, prioritizing responsible innovation, and crafting clear and adaptable regulations, they can ensure that Ethereum continues to thrive and reach its full potential. The year 2024 might not provide definitive answers, but it presents a critical opportunity to shape the future of Ethereum and usher in a new era of responsible and transformative blockchain technology.

Link:

Will Regulation Clip Ethereum: Navigating The Uncertain Regulatory Landscape For Ethereum Tokens In 2024 - Blockchain Magazine

At least the whole country music thing worked out for him

RileyGreenhas multiple #1 hits at country radio, Platinum and Gold records to his name, and is currently out on the road for his Aint My Last Rodeo tour, which has already sold over 200,000 tickets this year.

So yeah, like I said, a country music career has worked out just fine.

But initially, Riley was focused on sports, and he was actually the starting QB at Jacksonville State University from 2007 to 2009 after walking on. During that time, he started getting into playing music more, and ultimately, decided to try his hand at a music career.

Specifically, Riley once remembered a game his grandaddy was at where he took a big hit from a defensive end, which caused him to do three cartwheels, which also led his grandpa to give somebody hell on the other end of the field for I guess not throwing a flag on the play due to how hard Riley was hit.

Riley went on to say that, after coming to that one game, his grandpa encouraged him to start messin around with that guitar a little more, which is southern for This whole football thing is probably not going to work out and you should be exploring other options, in case you need a translation.

And during a quick interview with The Next Round during the the Regions Tradition Pro-Am golf tournament earlier this week, Riley admitted that he never even came close to graduating, and lasted maybe a semester or two after he started playing in local bars around Jacksonville.

He also told the hosts that he passed one class his very last semester which was aqua aerobics, one of those dumb electives they fore you to take:

I didnt get close to graduating I started playing in bars like, 2011, just quit going to close. I think I hung in there for another semester or two.

My last semester, I passed aqua aerobics, the only thing I passed.

And of course, thats really funny and makes me wonder what the other classes were, but my mind first went to wondering what it would be like to be in aqua aerobics class with Riley Green? A girl can dream, but I digress

Riley also explained that his academics were never really a focus of his, and before he started doing music, he was majoring in football:

I dont think I was gonna make it my academics were pretty limited.

I was majoring in football until I quit playing football, and then like I said, I started play in Brothers bar all those little spots. I couldnt make it to a 9:15 class.

It sounds like the odds of him ever graduating were low, not because he isnt intelligent but because he never really had the desire to do so.

And you certainly dont need a college degree to sell out arenas all over the country

You can watch the full interview with The Next Round here:

See the original post:

Riley Green Says He Only Passed Aqua Aerobics The Last Semester Before He Dropped Out Of College - Whiskey Riff

One might think there is limited room for innovation in the field of early morning personal alarm systems. After all, every smartphone is packed with a variety of features to help you get up in the morning.

However, local man Todd reckons that even the modern atmospheric, gently ascending tones cant hold a candle to how fast & consistently Aerobics Oz Style used to make him spring out of bed. He continued,

Mum knew I was a little crusty sock & tissue goblin so all she had to do was make sure the telly was loud enough at 6 am for me to hear the music for Aerobics Oz Style. I dont know who was up quicker me or my cretinous little adolescent pork chevup

We spoke to Todds mum who harnessed the power of his teenage thirst to her advantage in his school era. She told The Times,

Oh, he loved that show. It was his favourite which was unusual as I never really saw him trying to emulate the dances or anything. Hed just sit there glued to the screen eating his breakfast with a stupid look on his face

We asked Todd if he thought he was still conditioned to get up early for Aerobics Oz Style. He told The Times,

Honestly mate, all I need to know is that its scheduled to run. I wouldnt even need to hear it. I think I have a deep internal switch, like a survival mode, except its gawking at fitness models on the telly. Im not an animal mate, Im just a product of the 80s/90s

We reached out to Channel 10 to raise the point that bringing back the show at 6 am could be the failing broadcasterssaviour. Especially in this age of heightened awareness of the importance of physical fitness.

They declined to comment and said they were working on a new format where they get 15 of the worst attention-seekingshitcuntsyou know to compete in a reality TV version of the cult aerobics show.

We decided to end communications swiftly at that point.

Documenting the Human Zoo is thirsty work, so if you enjoyed what you read how about buying Belle a beer, ay?

See the article here:

Local Man Admits Aerobics Oz Style Was Still The Best Alarm Clock Hes Ever Had - The Bell Tower Times

Biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, who endorsed Donald Trump after pulling out from the 2024 White House race, has declared that he would accept an offer to be ex-president's running mate.

Ramaswamy recently appeared on PDB Podcast, and Patrick Bet-David sought his response on what if Trump wins and asks him to be his VP.

"Let's just say the president calls you, former president who's running right now, Trump calls you, he wins. Vivek, I want you to be the VP. I want you to be, after he wins, DAG. I want you to be Secretary of Commerce. I want you to be, is there any job you would say no to if he called you to say, I want you to help me with XYZ job?" the podcaster asked.

The Indian-American politician highlighted that he shares a good relationship with Trump and respects him immensely.

If he knows who I am, and we've got to know each other really well, if after knowing all of that, he would ask me to be vice president, or you brought up that example, let's just answer really honestly, anybody who cares about this country who's aligned with his vision and the Republican Party today, if they're asked to be vice president is going to say yes, and has a responsibility to say yes. And so I think that that goes without saying, he continued.

Its not me first, its not Trump first its America first," Ramaswamy asserted.

Responding to his announcement, one X user wrote: Vivek is dedicated to serving the country.

He sees it as service, not personal advancement, another reacted.

The announcement coincides with Ramaswamy's latest appearance in New York, where he has arrived to attend Trump's hush money trial in show of solidarity with other Republicans.

Also Read: Vivek Ramaswamy steps up attack on Biden administration as he joins Trump supporters at sham NY trial

Going forward, Ramaswamy reacted on his recent exchange with author Ann Coulter, who told him that she's wouldn't vote for him because he is an Indian.

I did not expect she would just kick it off right there, get right into the business. And I think it actually made for a really good conversation, believe it or not, he said on being asked about his conversation with Coulter.

Of course, I disagree with hell like her on that being a criteria to be the U.S. president is her description of whether or not you're an Indian. I'm born in the United States. I'm as American as they come, he added.

Calling it an honest discussion, Ramaswamy said: But I thought it actually formed a really strong basis for an honest conversation that we otherwise don't have because her view is that in order to actually be a U.S. president, you got to be even more American, right?

So you're not fully American if your parents weren't from the United States of America. And in order to trust somebody, the more generations they've been here, let's say you've been here six or seven generations, you have more of what she would call. I think she did call during the podcast, he added.

Ramaswamy, who has a history of opposing the hush money trial, is among Trump's top VP contenders. He is New York to spend the entire day with 77-year-old Trump.

Taking to X, he called the 45th president's trial a sham and said one lesson every American can take away from watching this trial: when weak-willed losers try to enter your life, run like hell in the other direction.

You know who ultimately actually casts the vote on this case? It's not just the jurors in that jury box. It's every American who votes this November to say NO to the weaponization of justice, he said while addressing the reporters on Tuesday.

See the article here:

Vivek Ramaswamy declares he would accept Trump's VP offer, claps back at Ann Coulter's racist remark - Hindustan Times

Vivek Ramaswamy and Ann Coulter in his podcast

Indian-American Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy was told by American author Ann Coulter in his podcast that she wouldn't have voted for him in the US presidential election because he is an "Indian".

Later, Mr Ramaswamy in a post on the microblogging website X said he respects Ms Coulter because "she had the guts to speak her mind."

"Ann Coulter told me flat-out to my face that she couldn't vote for me 'because you're an Indian,' even though she agreed with me more than most other candidates. I disagree with her but respect she had the guts to speak her mind. It was a riveting hour. The TRUTH podcast is back," Mr Ramaswamy said in the post.

From the beginning of the podcast, Ms Coulter went on to take swipes at the Indian-American leader who tried to run for US President, but had to eventually support Donald Trump's candidature.

"... Fantastic opening monologue. I too am a fan of yours. I am going to make a point to make it fun. You're so bright and articulate. I guess I can call you articulate since you're not an American black - can't say that about them, it's derogatory - I agree with many, many things you say probably more than most other candidates. But I still would not have voted for you because you're an Indian," Ms Coulter said.

In announcing the podcast, Mr Ramaswamy clearly mentioned the discussion between the two had some 'interesting' bits.

"Ann Coulter challenged me. I challenged her. This episode will challenge you. You're not going to want to miss it," he had posted on X.

Back when Mr Ramaswamy announced he would run for president and would be Mr Trump's replacement, Mr Trump had largely avoided criticising the Indian-American leader due to his strong praise and defence of the former US President.

However, the criticisms started mounting as voters started making their voices heard in the first-in-the-nation caucuses, and as Ramaswamy became more direct in laying out the case for why he was the Trump alternative.

Link:

"You're Indian": US Author On Why She Wouldn't Vote For Vivek Ramaswamy - NDTV

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.

Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.

Originally posted here:

Ann Coulter's Bluntly Racist Admission To Vivek Ramaswamy Is Jaw-Dropping - HuffPost

By Rachel Bowman For Dailymail.Com 17:55 09 May 2024, updated 19:18 09 May 2024

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter praised former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamybut then said she would not vote for him because of his ethnicity.

Thehedge fund multi-millionaire had a conversation with the conservative pundit on an episode of his show, The Truth Podcast, to discuss nationalism.

Ramaswamy warmly welcomed Coulter to the show where she returned with praise, calling the Republican rising star 'bright and articulate.'

Coulter said she agrees with Ramaswamy on many subjects, but shocked listeners with her reason for admitting she will not vote for him.

'I agreed with many, many things you said, in fact probably more than most other candidates when you were running for president, but I still would not have voted for you because you're an Indian,' Coulter said.

Ramaswamy is a 38-year-old father-of-two who campaigned on wanting to fix America's national identity crisis by ending the 'secular religion' of 'woke-ism.'

He has also been floated as a potential vice president pick for Donald Trump after dropping out of the Republican presidential primary in January.

Ramaswamy and Coulter agreed they both oppose the idea of dual citizenship, with the former candidate saying the 'essence of citizenship is which nation to whom you had your undivided loyalty.'

'You and I agree on so much there, but where II wouldn't say "lose you"but I may fail to fully understand you is, on that axis of citizenship, what does ethnicity have to do with the matter,' Ramaswamy said.

Coulter explained she will only vote for presidential candidates who are WASPs White Anglo-Saxon Protestants.

'There is a core national identity that is the identity of the WASP, and that doesn't mean we can't take anyone else ina Sri Lankan, a Japanese, or an Indianbut the core around which the nation's values are formed is the WASP,' she said.

'We've never had a president who didn't have at least partial English ancestry, never.'

The constitutional requirements to run for president in the United States are to be a natural-born citizen, be at least 35 years old and have resided in the country for 14 years.

Ramaswamy, the son of Indian immigrants, was born in Cincinnati. Hegraduated summa cum laude from Harvard in 2007 with a degree in biology. He went on to receive a JD from Yale Law School in 2013.

Listeners praised Ramaswamy for how he handled the conversation and slammed Coulter for her comments, calling them 'racists.'

'This interview, the way Vivek handled himself and continued the interview, shows the magnanimous man he is,' said Kim Carrico-Stephens on X.

'Ann Coulter you're an abhorrent racist! Vivek is America First, will not be bullied, strong class act of a human.'

'Vivek showed extreme class when Coulter stated flat out because of his race she would not vote for him,' said Eric Pistey.

'He kept the conversation going and never fell into an offended or victim mentality. Well done by him.'

Others commented that Coulters views are outdated and said it damages her reputation.

'She is a typical boomer-mentality-lady, you just listen to them, nod and go on with your life,' said Mayra Smith.

'Why does she continue to fly into the reputation bug zapper,' said Eric Stoner.

Excerpt from:

Conservative author Ann Coulter heaps praise on GOP rising star Vivek Ramaswamy - then tells him she wouldn't - Daily Mail

NEW DELHI: US author and commentator Ann Coulter said that she would not have voted for the Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy in the Presidential elections because he was an "Indian". Speaking to the Indian-American, who was running for President, Coulter said on his podcast 'Truth', I agreed with many, many things you said.. in fact probably more than most other candidates when you were running for president.. but I still would not have voted for you because youre an Indian. Responding to this, Ramaswamy later said on X, "I disagree with her but respect she had the guts to speak her mind. It was a riveting hour." Calling Ramaswamy "bright and articulate", the US author said, "I guess I can call you articulate since you're not an American black - can't say that about them, it's derogatory". The bit attracted reactions from people with one X user calling Coulter "Indophobic", while the other a "bigot". "It would be interesting to hear her rationale for being a bigot", a user wrote. However, some users came in support of Coulter with one saying, Vivek, you made it clear that you want America to be more accessible to Indian immigrants at a time when immigration restriction is a popular issue. Ann is correct to point that you have a vested ethnic interest in facilitating the great replacement." Earlier this year, Ramaswamy quit the US presidential race backing Donald Trump after his underdog campaign in the Republican Party's initial nominating contest in Iowa failed to gain significant traction. "I called Donald Trump to tell him I congratulate him on his victory. Now, going forward, he will have my full endorsement for the presidency. And I think were going to do the right thing for this country. And so Im going to ask you, to follow me in taking our America First movement to the next level, Ramaswamy had said.

Original post:

'Won't vote for you because you're an Indian': US author to Vivek Ramaswamy - The Times of India

Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox Get our free Inside Washington email

Failed 2024 Republican primary candidate Vivek Ramaswamy praised Ann Coulter for having the guts to make racist remarks directly to his face on his podcast this week.

Ms Coulter, a conservative firebrand with a history of openly racist remarks, appeared on the businessmans podcast, Truth, on Wednesday for an episode titled, The N Word: Nationalism.

Mr Ramaswamy welcomed Ms Coulter by telling her that he is a fan.

She replied that he is bright and articulate and notes that she wouldnt be allowed to say that to him, if he was an American Black.

She goes on to say that, even though she agreed with him more than most other GOP primary candidates, she would not have voted for him to be president because he is Indian.

She said: I agreed with many, many things you said during your campaign, in fact probably more than most other candidates when you were running for president. But I still would not have voted for you because youre an Indian.

She then claimed that the core national identity in the United States is a WASP - a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant.

[That] doesnt mean we cant take anyone else ina Sri Lankan, a Japanese, or an Indianbut the core around which the nations values are formed is the WASP, she continued.

Mr Ramaswamy was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, to Indian immigrant parents and is an American citizen. He would not have been eligible to run for president if he was not born in America.

Additionally, the Constitution of India does not permit holding of dual nationality by Indian nationals.

Mr Ramaswamy did not balk at Ms Coulters remarks, and the pair discussed their shared disdain of dual citizenship.

He pushed back on Ms Coulters idea that Americans whose families have been in the US for centuries were more American.

He argued that the children of immigrants could be more loyal to the US than a WASP, seventh generation descendent of some rich guy on the Upper East Side in Brooklyn that pretends to hate this country because its the cool thing to do.

Following the podcast, Mr Ramaswamy posted on X that he agreed with Ms Coulter on dual citizenship but disagreed with her reasoning on why she wouldnt vote for him. However he added that he admired her guts for telling him.

Ann Coulter told me flat-out to my face that she couldnt vote for me because youre an Indian, even though she agreed with me more than most other candidates, he wrote. I disagree with her but respect she had the guts to speak her mind. It was a riveting hour.

Congressman Ted Lieu, whose family immigrated to the US from Taiwan, said that he wasnt surprised by Ms Coulters racism but expressed sympathy for Mr Ramaswamys response.

I wasnt surprised that Ann Coulter made a racist statement about Vivek, he posted on X. What surprised me is the weakness and lack of self respect of @VivekGRamaswamy. Hes actually promoting this episode and praising the person who spewed raw racism to his face. I feel sorry for Vivek.

More:

Ann Coulter tells Vivek Ramaswamy she wouldn't vote for him because he's Indian - The Independent

Former GOP contender Vivek Ramaswamy, who recently exited the presidential race, found himself at the center of controversy on his podcast TRUTH. Ann Coulter's racially charged remark put the host in an uncomfortable position.

After Ramaswamy introduced American commentator and author on his podcast, she remarked and seems she was wearing her racial lens while talking to him, I too am a fan of yours, so Im going to make a point of disagreeing with you so it will be fun. You are so bright and articulate, and I guess I can call you articulate since youre not an American Black. Cant say that about them, thats derogatory.

She continued, I agreed with many, many things you said during in fact, probably more than most other candidates when you were running for president, but I still would not have voted for you because youre an Indian. Well get back to that.

Ramaswamy soaked in her racial attack and politely countered, that his loyalty is towards his country can't be defined by his skin colour. He went on to explain how an immigrant or the children of immigrants could have greater loyalty than a seventh-generation American who hates their own country.

After realising the racial tone of her answers Ann made a half hearted effort to defend her remark, "There is a core national identity that is the identity of the WASP and that doesnt mean we cant take anyone else in, a Sri Lankan, or a Japanese, or an Indian, but the core around which the nations values are formed is the WASP, she said.

She further went on to add, Weve never had a president who didnt have at least partial English ancestry. Never. Weve only had one Catholic president [sic]. There was only one Catholic signatory to the Declaration of Independence. They were all not only protestants, but pretty much Presbyterian.

After the podcast Ramaswamy commented on the episode in an X post, he chose to praise Coulter for her candor, despite adding that he personally disagreed with her views.

@AnnCoulter told me flat-out to my face that she couldnt vote for me because youre an Indian, even though she agreed with me more than most other candidates, he wrote. I disagree with her but respect she had the guts to speak her mind. It was a riveting hour. The TRUTH podcast is back.

Vivek won internet's praise his composed response, Got to respect racism this pure, exclaimed Richard Hanania.

"This is a MASTERCLASS in how to have a conversation,' Kartikeya Tanna added, Viveks conversation with her is pure GOLD. Much to learn from this temperament,

There's so much to learn from his cool, Sandeep Neel commented, Ann tells Vivek she wouldnt vote for him just because he's of Indian ethnicitybasically, not white or mixed. Vivek destroys Ann with pure logic and emotional intelligence. The way he handles the conversation? Pure gold.

Vertika Kanaujia is Editor Audience Growth at Hindustan Times and oversees the websites coverage of business news, health, technology and internet culture. She is a Chevening Scholar and a Columbia Journalism University Fellow. Vertika has been a journalist for more than 18 years. After starting her career as a business journalist in TV she has worked with various leading news channels. You can email her at vertika.kanaujia@htdigital.in....view detail

Continue reading here:

'because you are an Indian', Ann Coulter tells Vivek Ramaswamy why she won't vote for him, his response is brutal - Hindustan Times