As midterm elections approach, the fight for Onondaga Countys district attorney seat has brought two newcomers challenging longtime incumbent William Fitzpatrick.

Chuck Keller, an adjunct professor at Syracuse University and criminal defense attorney, is running against Fitzpatrick as a Democrat. Gary Lavine, who works at a Syracuse law firm, has been endorsed by the Conservative Party.

No one else in our society has the power over life, liberty, and reputation that a prosecutor does, Lavine said. The first order of business is having the self-awareness that there is a higher calling. The higher calling is to do justice and tell the truth.

The three candidates disagree on how the future district attorney should apply them to a well-established judicial system.

In a given county, the district attorney oversees the prosecutors office and is responsible for considering, investigating and potentially charging active cases in coordination with law enforcement officials. The DA also presents evidence to grand juries and makes recommendations to a presiding judge for a defendants bail, charges and length of prison sentence.

District attorneys are elected for four-year terms by popular vote in a general election. This year, voting will take place on Tuesday, Nov. 5 in Onondaga County.

The Onondaga County Democratic Committee has endorsed Keller, whose campaign has mainly focused on bail reform and prison alternatives. He hopes to increase scrutiny toward Fitzpatricks management of bail reform through consistent review while in office.

Echoing Kellers calls for systemic changes within the judicial system was Syracuse native and Republican Lavine, who currently serves as counsel to Bousquet Holstein PLLC. Lavine is also a member of the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics.

Lavine said his campaign, which is endorsed by the Onondaga County Conservative Party, is focused on restoring integrity to the position Republican incumbent Fitzpatrick has held for 27 years.

Lavine said that Fitzpatrick covered for former DA investigator Peter Rauch years before he drove while drunk and killed a teenager. Lavine referenced the alleged cover-up on campaign mailers, according to Syracuse.com.

The alleged incident is one of several matters of controversy Lavine said he felt deemed Fitzpatrick an unethical prosecutor.

Throughout his seven terms in office, Fitzpatrick has been challenged three times, according to Syracuse.com.

Since taking office in 1992, Fitzpatrick said the platforms and policies of district attorneys across the nation have changed for the better. Initially, prosecutors ran on popular platforms that emphasized conviction rates and longer prison sentences. Now, national trends have since shifted to embrace more progressive outlooks that favor decriminalization of lower-level crimes, he said.

While Fitzpatrick said hes glad prosecutors are no longer follow the tough-on-crime approach, he said he doesnt fully support progressive decriminalization.

I know we call them progressive, to me theyre frankly regressive, he said.

Instead, Fitzpatrick said he has focused his career on identifying underlying factors that contribute to crime and conviction rates. He also emphasized his role in facilitating transformation at the local level. Fitzpatrick promoted eight diversion programs which exclusively handle cases dealing with adolescents, people experiencing mental illness and other at-risk groups during his tenure.

Ideally, an understanding of the factors behind crime and conviction rates, applied to the countys diversion programs, would continue to lower New Yorks already-low incarceration rates, he said.

Is that a system that cries out for reform? I think thats a system that cries out to be replicated, Fitzpatrick said.

Recounting his over two-decade-long career as a defense attorney, Keller claimed the diversion programs are currently ineffective because a defendants participation in them is dependent upon them first entering a guilty plea.

Keller said issues relating to justice should not rely on partisanship, but accountability. Lavine echoed this, expressing his hopes that the elections votes will reflect a lack of partisanship. Fitzpatrick said at the end of the day, the DAs primary responsibility is to ensure safety and justice for both victims and defendants.

Having challengers in the DAs race provides a means of achieving that goal, Lavine said.

I personally cannot look the other way, Lavine said. Indifference and inaction lead to tyranny, and thats what we have in this county now.

Published on October 20, 2019 at 10:11 pm

Contact Marnie: ammunozc@syr.edu

Read more:
District attorney incumbent challanged for first time in over 10 years - The Daily Orange

Post Views: 229

How often do you wonder about what makes us different? Why dont we all act the same and are there reasons were each unique? Usually, answering these questions takes a significant amount of reading that goes beyond scratching the surface. Even though it would take less effort than before thanks to the internet, it still involves putting in the time to read through different articles on how we become who we are. But maybe that can change with shows like The Mind: Explained.

Long story short, if youre not as interested in psychology, the search for these answers might not seem like the most entertaining pastime. That lack of interest leads to the unfortunate truth that many wont have their curiosity sparked enough to learn more about potentially game changing topics. On a personal level, or any other level, these topics influence a persons view of themselves and cause them to do an entire 180 in life.

Now, imagine if you could get to know your brain by watching brief 20 minute episodes? As in, none of them are longer than the 30-minute TV shows we grew up watching once-upon-a-time on regular cable TV (minus the commercials and advertisements).

Netflixs The Mind: Explained did exactly that. A continuation of Voxs Explained series, this miniseries linked to the original concept is packaged and produced in a way thats brief but still gives in-depth knowledge on the human mind. The network producers and writers managed to give a diverse set of answers to the many questions we have about the most essential organ of our body: the brain.

The brain forms and shapes everything we are. The large and wrinkled block of grey matter, that far too often seems more foreign than it should, is looked at closely in this Emma Stone-narrated series.

The questions this series answers bring viewers one step closer to understanding their relationship with their own minds. Ranging from simple inquiries like, Why cant I remember what I did yesterday? to more complicated questions like, Why does my brain constantly rewrite past experiences and fill in the blanks in ways that arent always true? Why is anxiety disorder the most common mental disorder? Do our dreams actually serve a purpose, or are they just strange visions that come to us? How do our brains even formulate dreams in the first place?

For the sake of not sounding clich, its not necessary to claim this series will change your entire life. But the series could be life changing and is quite impactful. The fear of facing ourselves can often stand as an obstacle to fostering more self-awareness. Were most nervous about discovering facts that lead us to actually feeling like we have control over our lives.

These five episodes each go in-depth and explain topics that are either involved in todays popular conversations or are more absent from mainstream discussion.

Did you know that about 50% of your memory is more than likely made up? Thats because around 50% of the details we believe are hard coded into our minds actually change each year. Memory competitions, and how your emotions affect your episodic memory, are only a couple of topics discussed in this episode. As the first episode aired in the series, it highlights the complexity behind our memories. Even if you think youre completely right about something in the past, theres a chance your mind is acting deceitfully.

They say that story, place and emotion are the concoction helping us remember things more accurately. But what if your emotions get in the way? The most interesting part of the program: an explanation behind how memories of the past and our futures are linked.

While were resting, our brains are usually up to something. Interested in remembering what exactly was fluttering through your mind while remaining inactive for those suggested eight hours? Drinking large glasses of water before going to bed was one tip given by a featured neuroscientist.

If youre trying to dream vividly, you might want to look into the art of lucid dreaming. According to one interviewee, its a skill anyone can develop. Like practicing on a basketball court until youre good at dribbling, youre capable of training your mind to see actual images from throughout the day in your brains nightly visions. If youre able to vividly recall your dreams and sketch them out in a notebook, then youre on your way. You might even be able to interpret them better.

Disclaimer: This episode might get a little extreme for some people. The episode shows this preemptive warning within the first minute. Keeping this as objective as possible, the episode highlights the commonality of different forms of anxiety. Whether its panic attacks, a general sense of fear or paranoia or defining general anxiety disorder (GAD), the different types are examined.

Most importantly, the sickness isnt stigmatized. Its normalized, but not in a way that can cause someone to feel insensitive toward anothers mental condition. The topic is framed to show we should come forward to speak about something that affects a significant amount of the human population.

Long story short, we all have anxiety to different extents. Some people can just develop more triggers than others at certain points in their lives. The whys are explained through people who come forward to describe their stories, guest psychologists and neuroscientists.

Afraid of aging? Learn more about the secrets of a young Buddhist monk turned mindfulness meditation prodigy, who at 41 years old had the brain resembling that of a 33-year-old. It starts by paying attention to your breath. The minds mindfulness becomes more proactive from that simple starting point.

Intentional control of your brain activity is often seen as impossible. But through the ancient practice of Satipatthana, many monks have achieved something that amazes scientists. Through cultivating their mindfulness, they activated parts of the brain that are often involuntarily lit up by our bodies.

One of their main pieces of advice? Introspection is key.

Usually regarded as a taboo subject advocated by zany people, it was practically banned from peoples memory during the Nixon administration. However, recent sample studies emerged (generally small but still reporting key findings) about helping people process their anxiety or life-altering situations.

For example, this episode of The Mind: Explained opens with the story of a man diagnosed at 21 with a type of cancer targeting his lymphatic system. Although he survived, his anxiety about his body relapsing became overwhelming. While visiting a psychologist they told him about an experiential case meant for cancer patients. All the patients were prescribed psychedelic pills to calm their anxiety about death. The results? His brain found a new sense of peace along with all of the other patients in the trial run.

Similar cases also found remarkable results in treating and curing substance abuse addictions and depression. Maybe psychedelics can provide the results other plant or protein-based medicine cant do as successfully.

One of the big messages that the series delivers is if were living without an actual sense of self-awareness, are we living in reality? How do we know if were really being attentive to the world around us? Or are things just floating right above the heads were meant to unlock?

Understanding your mind is the most vital element of knowing your humanity. Although we might convince ourselves that self-awareness isnt important, its really just a mask that were putting on the truth. It definitely works to certain peoples advantages, but theres still that void between themselves and actually having some type of self-certainty. People who are usually twisting things around to fit into their own gravity pool can lack a genuine Im-in-control attitude. If we really want to get all psychology on it, the term for feeling like youre in control is locus of control, and the higher the better.

Our minds can be our best friends. Once we get to know them, it wont seem as scary or even surprising to make certain realizations about who we are. Our brains are meant to be discovered and if we make observations that wed like to alter about ourselves theyre equally as flexible to change.

Read more:
Get to Know Your Brain by Watching Netflix's 'The Mind: Explained' - Study Breaks

Sometimes, when things arent working, you just need to go in a different direction

Whatever way you look at it, ITVs documentary following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex around Africa, perhaps intended as a puff piece damage limitation after months of negative press has had the opposite effect to what was intended.

Instead of discussions about the human side of the couple in any positive light, or their causes and the movements they champion, two things have come away from the hour long documentary that Meghan feels coverage of her is unfair, and Harry wants to leave the UK and head to Africa full time. The image that came across was less of a well-meaning couple misunderstood and wanting...

Go here to see the original:
For their own sake, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex need to decide whether they are cut out for Royalty - Telegraph.co.uk

Classes dont start until Monday, but Tom Golden, 18, 20G, plays professor as he shows slides to a room of 35 first-year students.

Hes leading a 90-minute sexual misconduct and education training, the first of four sessions he will facilitate during first-year orientation on a Saturday in late August.

Golden is the graduate assistant for Break the Silence, an organization housed in Lehighs Office of Gender Violence Education and Support, which aims to provide students resources and healthy sexual education. Before he took the graduate assistant position, Golden belonged to the group as an undergraduate.

Golden cant remember exactly why he joined Break the Silence, but he does remember the burlesque troupe that came to campus for part of the organizations Five Senses of Consent event. He remembers the sex toys explored in the groups Sex Toys and BDSM programming. He remembers watching Break the Silence modernize its presentations to become more inclusive.

Now, as a graduate assistant, he offers guidance as Break the Silence undergraduates take charge of the programming plans.

Break the Silence doesnt have an executive board leadership flows through a committee-based, fountain model, in which some people will execute specific projects and events and the rest of the group pools its support.

Brooke DeSipio, Break the Silences adviser and the director of Gender Violence Education and Support, said the model allows members to take a step back if they need to while still participating in the organization.

I cant imagine not having a peer support group on campus, DeSipio said. I think a lot of students would not get the help they need.

She said Break the Silence members are trained on sexual misconduct resources and reporting options because their peers will often come to them for help. Break the Silence members are mandated reporters, so they are not a confidential resource.

DeSipio said students are more likely to tell a friend or Break the Silence member about their experiences than they are to tell a faculty member, staff member or official reporting option.

Caralyn Roeper, 21, believes she receives more questions about sexual education and misconduct than she would if she werent involved in Break the Silence.

She also said a few students called her this summer to ask for her help.

(I was called about) whats going on with a relationship, or like, This just happened to one of my friends who is at Lehigh over the summer, which is really cool that you become a resource for people, she said.

Roeper stressed how important it is for students to have a space on campus to talk about sexual assault, relationship abuse and sex education issues.

Sometimes, however, Break the Silence members have to initiate the conversation.

DeSipio said it takes a lot of self-awareness, self-reflection and identity development to be able to lead discussions on campus.

Its not easy to spend your time talking about sexual assault and relationship abuse and sex on campus, she said.

Break the Silence members can succeed by playing their cards correctly.And one of their cards says pornography.

Wascar Ramirez, 20, said first-year students shuffle across the Maginnes Hall rooms during orientation to arrange cards with different potentially toxic behaviors onto the Continuum of Harm. They must decide if behaviors are really bad, kind of bad or not so bad, and then the group discusses the decisions.

Ramirez, who is now in his fifth year as a member of Break the Silence, said many of the cards are written ambiguously to prompt better discussion.

(Pornography), on one hand, can be good because of self release, masturbation, Ramirez said. But on the other hand, a lot of mainstream porn doesnt show any consent, so it has all of those downstream negative effects.

Though Break the Silence can achieve transparency with students with its programming and education, Roeper said sometimes the university isnt as transparent with students. Because it is a business, it could potentially hurt Lehigh to release negative information about its students, faculty and staff, but Roeper thinks sharing reports of sexual harassment and assault doesnt reflect poorly on the university.

Sexual assault is a national issue, so Roeper thinks instances of sexual misconduct reveal more about the larger culture thats been created rather than individual institutions.

Sometimes its definitely discouraging being here and being a member of this organization as a part of Lehigh, she said, But its also reassuring that since our program started, weve made a lot of progress.

Break the Silence has made progress beyond the perimeters of Lehighs campus. Roeper said members advised Moravian College students in developing and running a program similar to Lehighs, because the college didnt have one in place.

Golden said the group has improved its education and outreach. And student reception has improved as a result.

He said this is the first year that a lot of Break the Silence members have had first-year students they trained during orientation approach them days and weeks after the session to chat and thank them.

I had one of my students (from orientation) say to me, I had sex this weekend and I used consent like you said, and she gave me a fist bump, Golden said. And that, like, never happened before.

Read the original post:
Break the Silence extends education, resources to students - The Brown and White

British artist Emma Witter uses a very different kind of medium. She collects and breathes new life into animal bones to create intricate sculptures of flowers, leaves and other natural objects.

Based in London, originally from Hertfordshire, she has just enjoyed a twelve-month residency at the prestigious Sarabande the organisation founded by fashion designer Lee Alexander McQueen CBE in 2007. Her botanical forms are symbolic and emotionally loaded, and she hopes to dispel the macabre association of bones and instead highlight the lightness and beauty of the material.

With heavy references to 16th and 17th century Dutch and Flemish painters who used the flower as a symbol of life and its fragility, the delicateness and beauty of Witter's sculptures has won her numerous awards and global attention. We spoke to Witter about this and more.

I just think theyre such beautiful objects. I love the gently curved forms, the symmetry, how they are so lightweight and yet immensely strong. I remember first having oxtail stew where the bones were whole, and marvelling at their beautiful, floral shape.

Theyre very much like orchids. I felt uneasy throwing these objects in the bin and started to keep hold of them, researching how to preserve them. They are so widely available as a byproduct, and I think a surprising and overlooked material resource for sculpture.

I feel very inspired by artists and designers who are really dedicated to their materials. Im quite obsessed at the moment with Fernando Laposse and how he is breaking down the fibres from different plants, like Cacti and corn husks, and creating new woven textures to be used for design objects. Grant Gibson presents a really good podcast called Material Matters where he interviews makers who are obsessive about a particular material.

Im inspired by science and nature and recently discovered the Linnean Society in Mayfair where you can book to go and look through the most beautiful old books of botanical illustrations. Im interested in London history and food history. I love the imagery of historical feasts and the theatrical presentation of food.

I collect bones over some time, from my cooking, dinners with friends, from visiting butchers and collecting kitchen waste from my chef friends like Mark Hix and Martin Sweeney at Petersham Nurseries. I boil the bones, scrub them clean and then leave them in bleach overnight. After drying them out, I categorise them into their 'families' of shapes before I start to play around with how the forms can gently interact with each other.

The process of preparing the material is very time-consuming and has become very ritualistic to me. I like the idea of salvaging this overlooked material to create something beautiful and lasting. Im often working on several experiments and pieces at a time. My studio is full of boxes of different categorised bones, tests and failures. Im trying all the time to marry the objects in a way that looks light, peaceful and elegant.

Ha! They thought it was a bit weird at first, and then just accepted me for who I am! Theyre all used to the bones, and know the drill at the end of dinner parties to pass them down for me, and hold onto their turkey carcasses after Christmas!

Its hard to say, as I think most children are creative. In that, they explore things freely and with gay abandon which of course as adults we now envy. As artists, we now strive to replicate the act of creating, without a crippling sense of self-awareness. As a child, I was very interested in nature and obsessively collected little objects. Every day before school, I would get up at 5am to enjoy a couple of hours of alone time in the garden. My dad would find me sitting outside, wholly immersed, testing the different densities of rocks, breaking them down with a hammer. I was unique!

I would have treasure boxes of things like snail shells and unique stones and would present these boxes selectively to only my most favourite of adults.

I studied Performance Design at Central Saint Martins and was interested in scenography. I didnt have any technical skills so leaned towards being inventive with unusual materials for example, I made costumes for a collaboration with the Rambert School of Dance, all from woven hair. I spent a lot of my student loan in Paks! I stuffed the dancers' little ballet bodices with padding to accentuate their bodies and then sewed on layers and layers of these lengths of hair, so it swooshed around with their movements.

For my final major project, I produced an immersive performance based around food and dining, where I particularly enjoyed the prop making of these weird imaginary 'meals', using food matter but in strange ways.

After I graduated, UAL funded me to set up my studio practice, and I explored this idea of food sculpture. This then fell into areas of both set design/prop making and sculpture as I started working commercially and also exhibiting.

It was amazing to be selected and feel a part of something so special. Especially as one of my best buddies Jonah Pontzer, who is an amazing painter, was also selected and we were put in the same studio. We shared one together a couple of years back and really missed it so it was extra special for us to be reunited! I met really amazing people, and it was a great platform for me to hold my solo exhibition. It all really just went by in a snap!

The people! 100% I think we all say the same thing. I met some amazingly talented, really special people Im so happy to have made friends with.

I think its important to align yourself with people or places that youre interested in...and I think when Ive been more genuine in what Im making it goes down better. Rather than trying to play it safe or thinking too much about being commercial.

Give it your absolute everything. I also think its really important to talk and have a peer group, go out and look at loads of shows, talk to the artists, be active. It really helps to share ideas and developments with other creative people and not be trapped in solitary confinement in your studio.

During London Design Festival, I saw Dan Tobin Smiths VOID installation at Collins Music Hall which blurred boundaries between nature and design. He filmed beautifully the inside of rare gemstones and then had them projected on a large scale to create an immersive space. I wanted to live in it.

You can see Emma Witter's work in a group exhibition called Chroma, which runs until 11 November in a gallery underneath the Catherine Provost store at 127 Sloane Street, London. Witter will also be featured in Blue, another group show at Andrea Hamilton Studios in Kinnerton Street, featuring 32 artists who share a passion for the sea.

Find out more about Emma Witter at http://www.emmawitter.co.uk.

Read the rest here:
Emma Witter on why she turns discarded animal bones into intricate botanical sculptures - Creative Boom

The sequel ten years in the making features on-brand humor and over-the-top zombie kills

Full of self-awareness and gruesome-yet-satisfying zombie kills, 2019s Zombieland: Double Tap is a solid film that recaptures the charm of its predecessor.

A decade after 2009s hit horror-comedy Zombieland earned over $100 million box office worldwide on a budget of $23 million, director Ruben Fleischers sequel saw a wide release on Oct. 18, 2019, just in time for Halloween.

Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Emma Stone and Abigail Breslin each reprise their roles as Columbus, Tallahassee, Wichita and Little Rock respectively. Joining the cast are Rosario Dawson as Nevada, Zoey Deutch as Madison and Luke Wilson as Albuquerque.

Double Tap opens with voiceover exposition, delivered by Eisenberg, feeding the audience information about the worlds developments over the past ten years. We learn of new developments with the group, including their recent coup in the White House. We are also introduced to the worlds new breeds of zombies: Homers, Hawkings and T-800s.

The original cast maintains the chemistry it established in the original, with significant plot lines developing the relationship between Columbus and Wichita, as well as Tallahassee and Little Rock.

The casts R-rated banter contribute to most of the films excellent scenes. The originals brand of humor established it as a cult classic comedy, and Zombieland: Double Tap does not miss a beat.

The film, although suffering from a few tropes and a thin plot, excels in every area one would expect: gory zombie kills, heartfelt family dynamics and satisfying character development.

In a sequel, callbacks and fanservice are expected. Double Tap features a handful of callbacks to iconic parts of the original. Columbus survival rules are expanded upon, and Tallahassee utters a catchphrase that is quickly mocked as outdated.

Double Tap takes a swipe at The Walking Dead early in the movie, and it lands well. Although, it is hard to ignore the cultural zeitgeist of zombies is seemingly on its way out.

One of the only negative aspects about Double Tap was its use of Zoey Deutchs character. Deutch stars as Madison, and uses a dated dumb blonde trope that feels grating very quickly. Deutchs performance is hilarious, but her characters trope seems more suited to a film from early 2010.

Zombieland: Double Tap is not a perfect film, but ultimately a satisfying sequel for fans of the original. It renews the charm and unique humor of its predecessor while giving its beloved charactersand their post-apocalyptic worldmeaningful development.

See the rest here:
Zombieland: Double Tap is equal parts enjoyable and endearing - IU Southeast Horizon

NewsBusiness

Creating the right working environment will pay off, finds Cherry Martin

While we live in times far removed from the cringe-worthy antics in offices and boardrooms of yesteryear, workplace culture is much more than a few millennials demanding better conditions and benefits at work. Staff have been campaigning for these rights for years and its not just about having a football table gathering dust.

The good news is that staff nowadays are more confident in demanding help from their bosses and within our contenders for the awards this year, we have a mix of new founders of companies being passionate about culture in the workplace, as well as established companies that have examined and refined theirs.

Any companys number one asset is its team, and here we highlight some of the best. If culture is seriously lacking where you work, maybe leave this page open on the relevant persons desk

Health is wealth

Healthy Performance measures feedback data daily to measure overall wellness and training needs.

As an organisation with performance in their bloodstream, they invest heavily in technology, the infrastructure of which crucially reduces pressure on their growing team. These bespoke systems include an operational management system, CRM, health screening software, plus online booking system, lifestyle assessment and mental health support tool.

One initiative to be applauded is their attitude towards exercise; allowing their team to take exercise during working hours, plus allowing them access to all of the wellbeing resources that they offer to clients.

A willingness to take increased ownership and responsibility for fulfilment

Finding, keeping and growing teams within fledgling businesses scaling at a rapid rate is an artform in itself, which is why SME of the Year contender Jigsaw Solutions brought HR consultant Anna Farrow in to support them in their period of growth. Anna implemented the Happiness at Work programme, which works by each employee following a series of five minute exercises in happiness and self exploration a day, and charting them in a happiness journal.

The success of her influence led Jigsaw to employ her on a full-time basis. Anna said: By supporting personal growth through increased self-awareness, we can create a better version of ourselves each and every day, which of course makes for improved engagement, fulfilment and ultimately performance.

There were no signs that the team were unhappy, but ethically it was and remains the right thing to do to challenge their current state, and ensure their happiness as a certainty.

Simply announcing Happiness At Work sent a very powerful message to our team, making it clear their happiness, fulfilment and wellbeing mattered. The six-week initial programme allowed us to bring together members of the team who wouldnt usually work together, building and nurturing supportive relationships, paving the way for healthy challenges to facilitate growth. We wanted to drive a feedback culture.

We gathered as a whole team every week to share learnings and discuss ideas to take forward. What I felt was the growth of the team and a willingness to take increased ownership and responsibility for happiness and fulfilment.

Our Perkbox insights tool, to measure engagement and workplace satisfaction, has seen our team engagement scores rise consistently.

EDAM Group, Britains largest privately owned credit-hire and post-accident services provider, interpreted their core values of innovation, respect, integrity, passion and fun as one team in a Minding EDAM wellbeing initiative.

Launched in May to encourage better mental health among their staff, they set aside time for colleagues to engage in mood-lifting events that included pilates, cycling, and a health and wellbeing check to encourage an open and honest culture. We look forward to hearing how this approach works.

Geogaming company CluedUp Games clearly see no constraints in geography with their innovative outdoor gaming pursuits, and theyve tackled team positivity and wellbeing in exactly the same way. Casting aside all traditional work place constraints, they strongly encourage flexible working practices giving employees the opportunity to set their own working hours and their locations on a day-to-day basis. No fixed hours, no set places of work, unlimited holiday allowance and the freedom to build a work-life around family commitments.

Yes, Ill let you pause reading this supplement to Google them and see if theyre hiring your skillset.

Useful Tip

If your budget so far this year has been eaten up, know that its free to do part of the Engaging Works Happiness at Work survey. You dont get all of the scientific data broken down, but you can see score movements for members of staff before and after doing the sessions.

See the original post:
Bringing culture into the workplace - inews

This piece originally appeared in Study Hall.

Caroline Calloway likes to be identified as a writer. She makes this abundantly clear in a post directed at Grace Spelman, formerly a content producer at BuzzFeed, during one of Calloways many forgettable spats with media workers whose criticisms she has found chafing.

FYI I prefer writer, like you, Grace, Calloway noted in a parenthetical within a wall of text (Spelman had called her an Instagram blogger, which, for my money, is pretty apt).

Elsewhere on her Instagram, Calloway posts a picture of Trick Mirror, the lauded debut essay collection from the New Yorker writer Jia Tolentino. The book makes her insecure, she writes, because she cant seem to measure up to Tolentinos pristine search results. When you type Jia Tolentino into Google you get: Great writer! Benefit of the doubt! Kind assumptions! Media EGOT! She contrasts this apparent luck with her own results, which yield unsparing (and, frankly, excessive) coverage of some poorly planned creativity workshops consisting of flower crowns, salads, and organized vulnerability.

Calloways writerly ambition had been to document her life in real time on a platform best known for sharing selfies, to pioneer a new genre of memoir while cultivating a loyal social media following. She had secured a book deal at one point but wasnt able to deliver due to a worsening addiction to Adderall, so Instagram remained her literary venue of choice. And why not? Many writers good writers self-publish via newsletters or blogging platforms; the choice of the photo-centric Instagram merely makes the writers intentions of self-commodification more straightforward. There could not be any confusion about what was being sold: not just prose, but the person herself.

But to describe Calloway as a writer first and foremost would be extraordinarily generous. Her frenzied, disjointed dispatches beneath photos of her art-cluttered West Village studio floor are, in and of themselves, often myopic and uninteresting. It is the media-fueled mythos around her the disintegrated book deal, the scam workshops, the sensational and damning the Cut essay from her former best friend and collaborator Natalie Beach that have earned my attention and emotional investment. To my shame, I read every word Calloway writes.

But perhaps Calloway could be forgiven for conflating the work of writing with the work of marketing oneself as a writer. After all, to be a writer today is to make yourself a product for public consumption on the internet, to project an appealing image that contextualizes the actual writing. The women and they are mostly women who are most heralded in the media industry today are extremely online, starring in photoshoots and documenting their skincare routines and eating habits as much as discussing their process.

The influencer is insecure about not being the writer. But over this past summer of viral internet-fueled grifts and an equally intense barrage of high-profile book launches and interview tours, it struck me that there is functionally little difference between a lauded writer with a recognizable avatar and a prominent social-media influencer. The only difference is in the way each metabolizes the experience of influence.

The most famous writers have always been public figures with their own media-fueled mythos, of course. We have the glamorous mystique of Joan Didion, whose aspirational cool has made her a persistent object of reverence for white women with literary ambitions; the wild lore of Hunter S Thompson with his drugs and guns, the cigarette holder and aviators instantly recognizable even to those who havent read him; and the literary Brat Pack of Bret Easton Ellis, Jay McInerney, and company, who were themselves objects of fascination as extensions of their depressive, decadent, druggy fiction. Benjamin Mosers new authorized biography of Susan Sontag painstakingly attempts to reconcile the writers contradictory private self with her glamorous persona as a public intellectual. The books many reviews grapple with the unreliability of biographical interpretation and the insertions of the biographers own biases and blindspots.

But the image management that once seemed incidental, or at least parallel, to the literary profession seems now one of its most necessary, integral functions. In the age of Twitter and Instagram, an online presence, which is necessarily public and necessarily consumable, seems all but mandatory for a writer who reaches (or hopes to reach) a certain level of renown, especially for anyone dealing in personal essays or cultural criticism. In the way that the influencer uses her image to sell her swag, the writer leverages her life to sell her work, to editors and audiences.

Naomi Fry, known for her sharp dissections of celebrity, social media, and meme culture at the New Yorker, is perhaps equally known for her own social media presence as a funny, astute documentarian of her personal life, though always within the context of her job at a prestige publication and with more than a whiff of irony. If celebrities who play well on social media do so by being funny and relatable but more glamorous than you, writers who play well on those same platforms do so by being funny and relatable but smarter and more successful than you.

Last year, Fry gave an interview to the Caret, a tech publication that interviews innovators and visionaries shaping the digital landscape, in which she took stock of her modest internet fame and connection to influencer culture. When it comes to so-called personal brand building, even when you dont think youre doing it, youre still kind of doing it, she said. So Im not going to pretend its something Im not totally aware of, as anyone on social media is. But I think its true that I have no interest in presenting my life in a way thats idealized.

Indeed, who in the irony-soaked world of New York media does? For all our talk of Instagram as a vehicle for curating an idealized self, we know grainy displays of self-awareness are the real ticket filterless, sparse bathroom mirror selfies are infinitely cooler than the obviously posed and airbrushed. They denote a certain status, in fact, that comes with being in on the collective joke, with understanding the illusory nature of the medium and making use of it in a wry punchline at your own expense. You dont have to look talented or elegant online as long as you are, or could be.

If you arent already (internet-)famous, the lack of idealization, or the appearance thereof, could hurt you in the eyes of your peers or bosses. This is not a concern for the writer-influencer. On social media they joke about not writing, about their elaborate procrastination techniques, about getting high, about angsting to their therapists who dont understand the internet. Like descendants of Carrie Bradshaw in her apartment with its designer shoe-filled oven, they are performatively, romantically messy.

I couldnt help but wonder: if this self-consciously unadorned authenticity the thing supposedly separating writers from the polished Instagram influencers they critique yields status, followers, and an aspirational yearning in their fans, whats the difference?

As digital journalism has converged with influencer culture, a whole genre of coverage has sprung up to account for it, including breathless book-launch coverage around star authors that feels more like celebrity voyeurism. We want to know what and how writers eat, which skincare products they smear on their faces, and what theyre reading when theyre not writing. And so we have the debut writers holy trinity of New York Magazines Grub Street Diet, Into the Glosss Top Shelf, and the New York Timess By the Book. Jia Tolentino checked all of these boxes throughout her very visible book publicity tour over the summer a relentless whirlwind of glowing press and made self-deprecating jokes about saturating our newsfeeds (which felt very much in keeping with her public image we had come to know through these dispatches).

I asked Tolentino in an email about this exposure, about the cultivation of a public persona online, and the degree to which she goes about doing so consciously. She responded that she had been thinking about the question a lot lately, as shed been strapped to the soul-crushing (if also very fortunate) machine of book promotion. She is distressed by the imperative to commodify herself to sell her work, but it is something she recognizes as inescapable.

A good amount of my book is about how capitalism, the internet, the monetized self are all destructive to our functioning as real humans; yet, the better I express those ideas, the better I become a marketable object myself, Tolentino explained. Ive spent a lot of time, while promoting Trick Mirror, wondering if the work that brings me the most meaning in life (writing) will always necessarily bring me deeper into the clutches of the things that I hate (capitalism, and a way of being in which external incentives seem more important than internal ones).

She tries to navigate her life online unconsciously, instinctively, and without losing sight of the fact that her real life is more important than what she projects to an audience. One of the worst things that the internet does is make us value representations of a thing over the actual thing itself, and I think I just try to stay tight to that understanding that my actual self and life are a lot more important to me than the online representation of such, that my work is more important to me than any public idea of that work.

Tavi Gevinson, the polymathic founder of Rookie, grapples with this duality between the work and the workers persona in a New York Magazine cover story on how Instagram fame shaped her sense of self and her career alike. I think I am a writer and an actor and an artist, she writes. But I havent believed the purity of my own intentions ever since I became my own salesperson, too. The more she focuses on her own work, embracing the archetype of the writer rather than the influencer, the farther away she stays from Instagram, delegating updates to an assistant.

But when it comes to the commodification of the self, the work and the public idea of the work are often conflated, just as the internet flattens everything else. Its harder to separate the art from the artist, or the artists skincare. Maybe that is the natural endpoint of the influencers internet. Caroline Calloways great project is, ultimately, making her inner life into what she calls digital art, her life and its representation one glorious entangled mess. She has pursued the solidification of a public idea first and foremost; the body of work she has amassed in her posts project the persona she has made for herself. She knows she is a salesperson both of Matisse knockoffs and of her actual self and not only bluntly admits it but confidently conflates it with her creativity.

The self-disclosure required of an influencer whose brand is vulnerability, already unsettlingly close to the work-mandated social-media shilling required of most writers, can become almost indistinguishable from the work of an essayist who deals in the personal. In this way, the influencer could simply be a digital update of the confessional writer.

Shannon Keating at BuzzFeed recently wrote an essay exploring how the Calloway phenomenon has prompted her to re-examine her choice to write first-person essays. She draws a line, as I also did, from the dusk of the first-person industrial complex to the dawn of the influencer, what she considers to be an even more complicated and ethically murky digital economy of self-exposure and service content, spawned by a desperation for a clearly defined sense of identity. Were looking for answers, writes Keating. Were looking for relatable (or even better, aspirational) role models who are willing to open their lives up to us for inspection, and social media has spawned an endless supply of them. (Its an arc that can be traced back to Emily Gould in the early days of Gawker, who documented her experience in a 2008 New York Times Magazine essay.)

The root of all this angst: Keating had recently written a viral essay for BuzzFeed about falling in love on a lesbian cruise, and the effects of that virality had rendered her a de facto influencer, which troubled her. Had she, through the act of writing, made her personal life into a public commodity? The last thing I wanted was to turn Lynette and me into some sort of lesbian influencer couple, selling us as a desirable product Id much rather people check up on me to read my latest article, not to learn whether or not Im still with my girlfriend, she writes. But as someone who mines her own life for content who always has and probably always will I know thats a ridiculous thing to wish for.

Calloway, for her part, does not seem conflicted about her self-exposure in the slightest; nor, really, does the journalist Lauren Duca, whose aggressive personal branding has propelled her to the level of living meme. Duca got famous for a Teen Vogue piece that, for better or worse, reintroduced the term gaslighting into our political and personal nomenclature, but equally for calling Tucker Carlson a sexist pig as her mic was cut. Then she sold T-shirts emblazoned with a catchphrase borrowed from Carlsons sexist rant.

Still, she insists her public presence isnt self-aggrandizing. She is furious at any comparisons between herself and Calloway, claiming they overshadow her serious and important work. But that work, at least after the initial Teen Vogue salvos and TV appearances, has undoubtedly been overshadowed by her own labor of peddling a persona. Like Calloway, Duca has drawn hundreds of thousands of followers not just through a body of writing but through the projection of a lifestyle that appears compelling in a not particularly radical or innovative way.

Highly paid talks, university teaching gigs, big book deals, and sassy clapback-style tweets is a pretty uncontroversial vision of success as a journalist that many of us would like to copy, whatever we think of Duca herself. But all of this external posturing has overshadowed any actual reportage: at some point, the work becomes the continued maintenance of the image.

To truly contend with a term I suppose we should define it. A social media influencer, according to the Digital Marketing Institute, is simply a user who has established credibility in a specific industry, has access to a huge audience and can persuade others to act based on their recommendations. This is a broad definition that could encompass everyone from Chrissy Teigen (a celebrity who effectively markets her relatability) to Shaun King (another alleged grifter).

When encountering the influencer, we must therefore determine how their credibility was established, in which specific industry, and to what end they deploy their powers of persuasion. The answers to those questions determine whether we view a person online as worthy of our reverence or our scorn. We can accept Jia Tolentinos skincare tips because we know the work at the core of this brand is as solid as it gets, whereas Caroline Calloway becomes a punchline, because even the content that did exist was a ghostwritten illusion.

The problem comes down to the way we view work, and what we view as work in the first place. There is a perception that to simply exist in public space, to influence by living, is not work at all. These influencers who produce photos of themselves, who turn their wider lives into content rather than confining themselves to a byline, are thus dismissed as vapid and shallow, sources of pleasure and no more. The writer, by contrast, is viewed primarily as a purveyor of intellect and meritorious beauty. The writer gives us art, gives us insight and rigor, contextualizes the phenomena that confound us. Their labor is seen as more valid.

But these two imperatives are increasingly inextricable. The internet has become what Tolentino, in our exchange, called persona-based, which has sometimes worked to her advantage. Having come into media outside New York, with no connections and no experience, Ive always been aware that I owe a lot of my career to the fact that my temperament, my self, and my life all map well and easily onto the persona-based internet, she wrote, which has become a horrible substitute for a safety net for a lot of people, from medical GoFundMes to personal brands.

One must have a persona on the persona-based internet, but the persona must be honest, or at least maintain the appearance of honesty. The cultural critic Sarah Nicole Prickett expressed a shrugging ambivalence on the matter of her public persona in an interview with Mask Magazine. I very much have a public persona, even though its a small public, but I feel detached from it, she told Masks co-founding editor Hanna Hurr, who had asked about Pricketts Instagram presence, a cavalcade of sultry selfies, gallery installation shots, and party documentation with more conventionally famous friends. Its something I have, not something I am. Its not even something I feel like I made with any intent, which is also not something Im proud about.

Gevinson echoed this insistence that existing online for her had never been a thing she agonized over. Ive always thought I could be myself in public pretty easily by which I mean, speak without second-guessing myself too much on social media, in writing, in interviews. Artifice was not just absent from her online persona; it was something she feared and actively avoided. I never considered myself calculating who does? and when I did catch glimpses of my own ambition, I thought it was ugly, disgraceful, incongruous with my authentic self, who simply wanted to make things and connect with people and probably, one day, move to the woods.

The great division between writers and influencers is the appearance of effort in exerting influence. Its never cool to look like youre trying too hard. Calloway raves about her shape-shifting acumen, her persona-building, her bottomless ambition to create herself for her own profit; Prickett professes to think very little about her persona, while posing for her own essay on structured denim in SSENSE and being featured as a scene stealer by Mac Cosmetics. If the end result is the same, how much does the division matter?

The writer-influencers identity must be quickly identifiable by the consumer, distilled to a meme-like essence in which content is the same as form. The writing is lifestyle, and vice versa. Tolentino as a cool girl who plays beer pong and smokes a lot of weed. Prickett as an aloof and modelesque bohemian socialite. Fry as a funny and enviably fun-natured lover of all things lowbrow, proclaiming her obsessions with reality shows and random celebrities. Cat Marnell as a romantically messy party girl, a blonde and waifish Bukowski. Olivia Nuzzi as a shoeleather politico, the hot girl in a boys club with the establishment boyfriend to match. Taffy Brodesser-Akner as likable and liked, relatable and intellectual at the same time, the woman who, right now, has it all. Taffys (she can only be Taffy) enthusiasm is even raised as a curious anomaly in journalism; a Punch profiler described her as buoyant a palpable, energetic presence thats difficult to square with the typical image of a lurking or inconspicuous reporter. In other words: she doesnt even seem like a writer!

As a writer without much in the way of influence, I see these women and I feel an imperative to find the thing about me that could best be underscored, amplified, and repeated across platforms, the fragment of self that could become persona. I do not believe any of them to be calculating persona-crafters I take them at their word that what they present is authentic but I believe they have a very useful instinct, in addition to their talent for writing, for precisely which parts of themselves to share and how. Frankly, I fear that is an instinct that I lack but would do well to cultivate. The media industry is less stable than ever, and the one safe strategy seems to be the commodification of personality, turning your voice into followers and paid subscribers that no CEO can take away. We are all but forced to make ourselves, not just our words, the thing we sell.

If were lucky, like Tolentino said, the soul-crushing machine of self-promotion will come for us and the capitalist imperative we hate will become one with the art or work that we love. So maybe theres something to be said for throwing oneself into it wholeheartedly, without shame, maybe even skipping the part where you fritter away underpaid labor in the hopes that someone higher up will notice you. How many women wrote revealing first-person essays and came up empty handed? If were not lucky, the machine doesnt come at all.

Im not immune to any of this. I am acutely aware that I lack Gevinson and Prickett and Frys effortless knack at existing online that I am neurotic and prone to self-doubt in a way that stifles organic self-expression and that makes me anxious. Then I think about what it would mean to supplant that natural instinct with an intentionally crafted persona, and that makes me hate myself. I consider being more vulnerable on Twitter, then I consider all the ways in which that could backfire; I consider posting selfies; I consider writing personal essays and then I consider how all the ways I could mine my life for content make me want to crawl into a hole. The fact that all of the above is agonizing for me to think about makes me feel I am not cut out for this industry in its current state.

I consider also how the women whose work I most admire, whose careers I most want to emulate, are also women who I want to be. Whether or not that is by design, I cant help but feel it is no small part of what continues to drive me to click on their links and buy their books.

It does not escape me that I have been considering only women, that the question of how to optimally present oneself online feels distinctly feminine, and this feels unfair even as the skill is somewhat advantageous, but mostly it feels inevitable. We are socialized to be highly attuned to making ourselves palatable for an audience, to be pleasing to the eye and the ear. This is the case as much on Twitter and Instagram as the physical world. And so we are slotted into this category, seen as much for our apartments and outfits as our writing, left to compete on every level at once.

Meanwhile, the hard-bitten male longform journalist posting Instagram stories of unknown jungles is not treated or viewed as an influencer; he doesnt even worry about his influence in the first place. Nor does the male blogger-turned-venture capitalist who tweets and podcasts constantly. Nor the male mid-level editor bragging about an obviously four-figure fashion purchase on social media. The age of the famous dudeitor middle-aged bros casually dominating media in a laid-back, unaffected posture is over, even though their domination no doubt remains in the background. (Anonymity is a luxury.) Instead we have the age of the woman writer-influencer, both journalist and celebrity.

Im not sure that theres an answer here, only that while I wring my hands over whether to press send on a tweet or make my private Instagram public, Caroline Calloway is meeting with producers interested in turning her Insta-memoir into a movie. I still do not think she is primarily a writer. I do, however, think we have entered a point of no return in the realm of media-industry success that necessarily brings us closer to her than we would perhaps like to admit.

Those who insist that the job of the writer is simply, only, to write are deluding themselves. Editors whose advice is to get off Twitter, put your head down, and do the work are missing something fundamental and indispensable about digital media. Its that all the things that invite derision for influencers self-promotion, fishing for likes, posting about the minutiae of your life for relatability points are also integral to the career of a writer online. At least if you want to be visited by that holy trinity when it comes time for your book launch, you must be an influencer in all the ways that matter.

Read more here:
The journalist as influencer: how we sell ourselves on social media - The Guardian

Remember all those scandalous things, the big scoops, and the incredulous stories we heard or read about the pop icon? The music legend retells all those (and then some) with a lot of wit, humour and self-awareness.

152903566X

The book is replete with anecdotes not just about Elton but also people from his social circle. The name- dropping is not ostentatious, it is organic to incidents and accidents in his life. Like once, when he was often under the influence of dangerous amounts of an addictive stimulant drug, he threw a party. And he recalls, I was flying... When a scruffy-looking guy I didnt recognize wandered into the party. I loudly demanded to know what the gardener was doing helping himself to a drink. There was a moments shocked silence, broken by the sound of Bob Halleys voice: Elton, thats not the f*&@ing gardener. Its Bob Dylan.

1509853316

He even gave the iconic Andy Warhol the snub. Elton was hanging out with John Lennon doing drugs, when Warhold knocked at their hotel suite. They decided against opening the door as they didnt want to be clicked. So Warhol kept knocking and finally left.

Elton recalls, after he debuted with his new hairdo at the Freddie Mercury Tribute Concert, a writer noted, that I looked like I had a dead squirrel on my head. He was mean, but I was forced to concede, he also had a point.

The honesty, through which he looks at himself makes it different from the regular celebrity memoirs. Its a firecracker of a gift this Diwali. He owns it.

At Hindustan Times, we help you stay up-to-date with latest trends and products. Hindustan Times has affiliate partnership, so we may get a part of the revenue when you make a purchase.

Follow more stories on Facebook and Twitter

First Published:Oct 21, 2019 16:50 IST

Read the original here:
Sir Elton Johns autobiography is warm, moving and a hit - Hindustan Times

Cher transplanted Las Vegas glitz to the O2MARILYN KINGWILL

The first thing that struck you about Chers O2 extravaganza: wow, her voice sounds great. Who cares if it wasnt always coming out of her mouth. This is Cher World, where nature is your enemy and nothing is fake if you paid good money for it. And second, how exactly did she manage to transplant the multicoloured glitz of Las Vegas to the granite grey industrial zone of North Greenwich? It is one thing to do a costume change per song, but to do an entire set change per song? Thats impressive.

Just in case anyone wasnt sure who Chers core audience is, oiled-up gladiators enacted a pneumatic dance routine before the worlds least subtle 73-year-old descended on to the stage, wearing a massive blue

Want to read more?

Subscribe now and get unlimited digital access on web and our smartphone and tablet apps, free for your first month.

Go here to see the original:
Cher review camp is too austere a word to cover it - The Times