3/15/2020 Many young players used the Aeroflot Open to gather some tournament experience. Some of their names are not so familiar. One of them, 14 year old Aydin Suleymanli, made himself a name by simply winning the tournament. THORSTEN CMIEL introduces the next generation. | Photo: ChessBase India

ChessBase 15 - Mega package

Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2020 with 8 million games and more than 80,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!

More...

It turns out to be a great method to follow players who are improving their practical skill level in all phases. Watching their games and analysing the interesting moments, is a good way to improve the own chess skill level. Talented young players show a chess performance explosion ever so often. In Moscow, two new outstanding talents have entered the world stage.

The risk appetite among most strongest youth players is higher than that of the saturated top of the world. This is why Alireza was able to challenge the chess elite in Wijk aan Zee and spread a bit of fear and terror. At least with the white pieces, he often goes straight for the king which is rather unusual for super grand masters. Normally Alireza is traditionally participating in Moscow, but this time he surprisingly received an invitation as a substitute in Prague, which he won, and had to pass at Aeroflot due to overlap. In Moscow, some other young talents were showing that they could soon follow the Iranian to Olympus.

A colorful mix of exciting moments and games show how confidently young players with ambitions play for victory. Older players tend to lose their breath in the last rounds. Not so with many juniors, who have enough stamina to prepare themselves just as meticulously for the final rounds as they do for the first ones.

In 2020 the AzerbaijaniAydin Suleymanli, born in 2005, won the world's strongest open tournament at the age of 14. His score of 7 out of 9 in Moscow corresponded to a performance of 2791 points. For comparison, Vincent Keymer's performance with 8 out of 9 at the Grenke Open 2018 represented a performance of 2795 against significantly weaker opponents. Historically, there was someone a girl in fact who was more successful:

In 1989 in Rome, Sofia Polgar, at the age of 14, achieved one of the best measurable chess achievements and made history.

Her result of 8 out of 9 corresponded to a performance of 2879 according to New in Chess. Incidentally, the younger sister of Sofia, Judit, was already number 1 in the women's world ranking at the age of twelve.

Sofia Polgar was able to keep a better overview than her opponents, especially in tactically complicated positions. In particular with black, she was often worse off after the opening phase, but she showed her extraordinary fighting qualities.

Judit and Sofie Polgar 1988 | Photo: Gerhard HundGFHund /CC BY

The winner inMoscow told ChessBase India a few months ago that he no longer went to school and already saw himself as a chess professional. His coach is Farid Abbasov, an Azerbaijani grandmaster who isnt very active himself. Aydin is currently the reigning U14 world champion and has recently improved his results. At the European Club Cup, for example, Aydin achieved a performance of over 2700 with an opponent average of 2487 with 5.5 out of 7. With his victory, he achieved a grandmaster norm, won 38 Elo points and advanced to an Elo rating of over 2500 points for the first time.

Aydin performed well particularly in the second half of the tournament by scoring a full point three times in a row in round 6, 7 and 8. The youngster was very convincing in his game against Parham Maghsoodloo.

Photo: Eteri Kublashvili

In the first half of the tournament, a twelve-year-old Indian (born in 2007) dominated the field in Moscow. After losing to Rauf Mamedarov in the middle of the tournament, he seemed to be running out of breath. After six rounds, he already had at least an eight-round grandmaster norm and even exceeded it by winning the last round with a point. His performance of 2707 points continues to attract attention. Bharath is a student from the Ramesh performance group in Chennai and has already collected several titles in children's chess. His trainer was delighted with this success. Bharath can theoretically break Karjakin's age record as the youngest grandmaster of all time.

The Russian is an international champion with a current rating of 2442. His result of five points against an opposing average of 2590 corresponded to a performance of 2633 and brought him an increase of 23 rating points.

Arseniy seems to want to follow the example of his compatriot Esipenko and initially refrain from gaining less important titles (IM, FM). With a rating of 2501, the Russian was number set as starting position 67. Aside from his brutal loss against Praggnanandhaa in the final round, he played a solid tournament, reaching a performance of 2618 and a grandmaster norm.

Another Azeri achieved a grand master norm in Moscow with a performance of 2604. He played in the B-Open and gained 22 points in Moscow.

The Belarusian narrowly failed to gain the grandmaster norm. She entered the A-Open with an Elo rating of 2404 and earned 50 percent with an opposing average of 2587. Her performance is all the more remarkable if you take a look at the current women's world rankings. The Indian Koneru Humpy has just become the new number 2 at 2586.

The Indian is FIDE Master and achieved an IM norm with a performance of 2528. At the beginning of the tournament, he was even on track for a grand master norm for a long time.

In addition to the title hunters, there were of course some other well-known teenagers who are already grandmasters or have long since had their grandmaster norms. Praggnanandhaa, currently number 12 in the junior world rankings in March 2020, was unable to exploit a number of promising positions, although it looked good for him in the beginning. For Nodirbek Abdusattorov things were not going so well in Moscow this time, and he lost 17 rating points.

Read the original:

New faces at the Aeroflot Open - Chessbase News

The Talmud is wrong, Al Pacinos character says in the first episode of Hunters. Living well is not the best revenge. You know what the best revenge is? Revenge.

The show, which premiered in late February, follows Pacino as Meyer Offerman, a wealthy Holocaust survivor in 1977 New York who leads a band of misfit killers on a mission to torture and murder as many former Nazis as they can. Meanwhile, a new generation of white supremacists infiltrates the U.S. government and plans to institute a Fourth Reich to pick up where Adolf Hitler left off. The two groups soon begin killing each other in increasingly brutal ways.

The shows storytelling is clumsy, an uneven cross between the campy gore of Quentin Tarantinos Inglourious Basterds (2009) and the self-serious melodrama of Orson Welless The Stranger (1946). In one scene, Meyer and his gang crack lighthearted jokes as they slaughter Americas favorite enemies. But then, in overdramatic flashbacks to Auschwitz, we are reminded that Nazis are no laughing matter. These tonal jumps are disorienting, and the confusion is heightened by the fact that rookie writer and director David Weil throws in a circuitous subplot involving a lesbian FBI agent on the trail of Nazi infiltrators in NASA.

Weil attempts to tie the plot of Hunters together with an ongoing conversation between Meyer and his protege Jonah Heidelman (Logan Lerman). The question is whether it is fairer to deliver the Nazis justice or mercy. But during the final episode, Weil abandons the question almost completely. In a bizarre twist, Jonah learns that Meyer is no Jew at all, but rather a self-hating Nazi making amends for his war crimes by slaughtering his former compatriots.

After more than 10 hours of gratuitous violence pasted over with Meyers wry invocations of the Torah and Talmud, the revelation is jarring. If this were Philip Roth, we would have been treated to a whole other story agonizing over Jewish identity. But since this is post-prestige TV, Weil moves right on to the next twist: Hitler and his lover Eva Braun are still alive and apparently cavorting in Argentina no doubt a setup for a second season.

If we get one, I hope Weil will have matured. Hunters is an example of a beginner swinging for the fences in almost every way imaginable and missing every time.

The shows failure became apparent only two days after it dropped, when the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in Poland denounced it for a depiction of sadistic torture that took place inside the camps. In the scene in question, a Nazi forces a Jewish chess champion to play him in a game of human chess. The Nazis and the Jew call out moves, and the various players move around the board, killing each other as directed. An aerial shot shows hundreds of naked, dead bodies rotting in the sun as the masterminds move their chess players.

The scene is horrific. It also has no basis in fact, which the museum was quick to point out on Twitter.

Inventing a fake game of human chess for @huntersonprime is not only dangerous foolishness & caricature, the museum wrote. It also welcomes future deniers. We honor the victims by preserving factual accuracy.

Weil wrote a long response, saying that he invented the episode to show respect to the victims of the Holocaust without borrowing from a real persons specific life or experience. He explained that the chess scene was a representationally truthful story intended to powerfully counteract the revisionist narrative that whitewashes Nazi perpetration of crimes against Jews.

Weil added that his own grandmother was a Holocaust survivor and that the show is largely dedicated to her memory and the memory of others who survived the camps. He said that he went to great lengths to avoid misrepresenting a real person or borrowing from a specific moment in an actual persons life.

That was the responsibility that weighed on me every night and every morning for years, while writing, producing, editing this show, he wrote. It is the thing I go to sleep thinking about and the thing I wake up working to honor.

Attempting to respect the victims of the Holocaust is a noble sentiment, but making up stories about them is an odd way to do it. Nearly every work of art that doesnt hew closely to the gruesome, well-documented facts of the Shoah comes off poorly. Classics such as The Boys From Brazil (1978) and Marathon Man (1976) now seem like paranoia-inflected fantasies. Inglourious Basterds is commercialized bloodlust. Even Roberto Begninis Academy Award-winning Life is Beautiful (1997), so beloved upon its release, seems naive and tone-deaf in hindsight.

The Holocaust is one of the great human tragedies in living memory. Depicting it in art will always be difficult, and for some, impossible. The unskilled had best to stick to Theodor Adornos maxim: There can be no poetry after Auschwitz.

Nicholas Rowan is a staff writer for the Washington Examiner.

Follow this link:

Hunters botches the Holocaust - Washington Examiner

Chennai, March 10 (IANS): On the International Women's Day when Prime Minister Narendra Modi handed over his social media accounts to seven women, the Tamil Nadu State Chess Association and its affiliate Erode District Chess Circle denied a mother and daughter to write the chess arbiter's examination.

A total of five persons from Erode including the two women were not allowed to write the arbiter's exam that was held on March 8 despite paying Rs 1,000 each as exam fees.

"I had been preparing for the arbiter exam for 15 days. I didn't expect the Secretary of Erode District Chess Circle not accepting the exam application and forwarding that to Tamil Nadu State Chess Association (TNSCA)," T.Kanmane, a former Erode district chess player told IANS.

Kanmane is a qualified teacher for mentally retarded teacher. She is working in a school for mentally retarded children.

As per the arbiter exam procedure, an aspirant should route his/her application through the district chess association. The Secretary of the District Chess Association has to give his nod/recommendation in the exam form so that a candidate can write the exam.

According to Kanmane, an email was sent to Tamil Nadu State Chess Association saying that the Secretary of its Erode district affiliate did not accept and forward the exam application, but of no avail.

Not only Kanmane, even the exam applications her mother T.Intherane and her father N. Thirugnanasampandam were not accepted by the Erode District Chess Circle.

"For the past several years we have been organising chess tournaments in Erode. This time we thought of writing the arbiter's exam and get ourselves qualified," Thirugnanasampandam told IANS.

"I used to play in 1980s and also used to lend a helping hand to tournament organisers as an unofficial arbiter. RecentlyA I came to know about arbiter exams and decided to write the same to become a qualified arbiter," S. Kalyanasundaram whose was not allowed to write the exam despite paying the fees told IANS.

For all the five persons former Secretary of the then Erode District Chess Association R. Nachimuthu acted as the coordinator on the exam matter.

"The five persons who are all members of Erode Mavatta Chaduranga Kazhagam had asked me to do the needful like submitting the application forms to the Erode District Chess Circle and other related work," Nachimuthu, Executive Committee Member of the Kazhagam told IANS.

He said the Erode District Chess Circle Secretary S.Ramesh did not accept the exam applications and was not reachable on phone.

Nachimuthu said as the exam date was nearing, he had sent the applications directly to Tamil Nadu State Chess Association, but he nor the applicants have not received any reply from the state chess body.

When contacted for his comments Ramesh, Secretary of Erode District Chess Circle told IANS: "These people had never lent a helping hand for the events organised by the official body. They also hold their own events. Will you allow a non-journalist into your journalist association?"

Tamil Nadu State Chess Association Secretary P. Stephen Balasamy was not available for comments when contacted by IANS.

It may be recalled last October, 11-year old school boy Karthick Rahul was arbitrarily evicted from The Hindu Tamil Nadu State Level Chess Tournament Tirunelveli Under-13 midway by the secretary of Tirunelveli District Chess Development Association (TDCDA) in Tamil Nadu for playing in tournament that was not affiliated to the district or state associations and AICF.

Visit link:

2 Erode women not allowed to write chess arbiter exam in TN - Daijiworld.com

The push-and-pull going on between Tom Brady and the Patriots has a familiar feel to it.

If youre Ty Law, or any other elite former Patriot who has tussled with Bill Belichick over money or respect listening to all the back-and-forth fodder with regard to Bradys free agency isnt surprising.

The Hall of Fame cornerback certainly had his contract battles with the Hoodie in the past. It came to a head in 2005, when the three-time Super Bowl winner was released after 10 seasons due in part to his $12.5 million cap hit.

Its a chess match going on right now, Law said Wednesday, when reached on the West Coast.

He gets it.

Like so many, he doesnt want Brady to leave the Patriots. He wants the 4-time Super Bowl MVP to finish his career with the same team he started with in 2000. But Law also has the perspective of being in New England himself and making Belichick make a hard choice.

He knows you dont always get what you wish for.

Ive said this a few times already. Hes given us 20 years. Hopefully (Brady) doesnt leave. No one wants to see Tom Brady leave New England, said Law, who won three Super Bowls with the quarterback. If he stays, he gets to do something not too many people get to do. But at the same time, theres all the all-time greats that have left. Look at Jerry Rice, Joe Montana, Emmitt Smith. The list goes on other great Hall of Famers. They move on.

While Law is on a mission these days to promote his new venture hes now tackling a partnership with V-One Vodka he couldnt help but weigh in further on Bradys pending free agency.

For whatever his reasons are, whatever happens, I dont think theres any right or wrong to whatever (Bradys) decision is, said Law. Its the best decision for Tom Brady. And whatever it is, none of us know.

But if he leaves, guess what? Hes still going to have a statue out in the stadium at some point because he deserves that, Law went on. Hes always going to be synonymous with the New England Patriots.

After Law was sent packing by Belichick, he went on to play with four other teams and retired in 2009.

He said he doesnt have any inside information about Bradys future, or where his former teammate and friend might end up. Law expects Belichick will extend an offer and keep Brady if thats what he thinks is best for the organization. And if Belichick decides its better for the Patriots to go on without the GOAT, and leave Brady to make a choice outside of New England, there was a report Wednesday that the Buccaneers are going all in for him.

(Belichick) released me. He releases a lot of people. No one is exempt, even though some are more difficult decisions than others, Law said. But Tom got here because Belichick wasnt afraid to make the difficult decision when it came to Drew (Bledsoe). Or Lawyer Malloy, or (Richard) Seymour. Its a business at the end of the day.

And Tom has to make a business decision. If he wants to play his last few years somewhere else because I think its beyond money at this point. Its like, maybe theres a challenge with a change of scenery.

If thats the case, Law says wish No. 12 well.

I say best of luck to him whatever decision he makes in the end, and the same for the organization, said Law. He gave 20 years of his life. People need to stay off his back, leave him alone, let him live and if he leaves, what? Football is still going to be played whether he stays or leaves. Football is still happening.

No matter this outcome, fans in New England are going to have to get used to not having Brady behind center in Foxboro at some point. Its going to happen eventually. As Belichick would say, it is what it is.

At some point, Tom Brady is not going to be suiting up for the New England Patriots. At some point, were all going to have to get over it, and move on, said Law. Its not an end (for the Patriots). All good things come to an end, whether its his choice, or not his choice. So right now he has a choice for what hes going to do, so let him live.

More:

Ty Law weighs in on chess match between Tom Brady and Patriots - Boston Herald

The World Junior Championship 1987 was a very special event for me. Since it took place in Baguio City (Philippines), it was my first opportunity to travel outside of the "iron curtain" and see the world's top junior players. In those prehistoric times, young players were not spoiled with an abundance of tournaments, so the whole world's junior elite took part in the championship. I knew for sure that a future world champion (or even champions) was playing in the beautiful convention center, and I even could predict who they were. The easiest candidate for the future world title to predict was Viswanathan Anand.

During our training camp before the world championship, we studied the games of our future opponents. Long before computers and databases changed the way chess players study chess, we had a bunch of folders with Xerox copies of our opponent's games. I still have some of them Of all the foreign opponents, Anand looked like the most dangerous one. We heard all kinds of legends about the speed of his play. Our coaches were showing a game from the previous World Junior Championship where Anand beat the Soviet representative, future super-GM Bareev, and spent about 15 minutes for the whole game!

Yes, White's play was very logical and strong, but how it was humanely possible to play such a beautiful game in just 15 minutes? During the World Junior Championship in 1987, Anand kept playing very fast. In fact, I was telling everyone that I pushed Anand into severe time trouble because he spent 40 minutes in our game. (The time control was 40 moves in two hours, then 20 moves in one hour, and then the game would be adjourned.

When it was Ivanchuk's turn to play Anand, I told him that he should do anything he can to avoid time trouble. "You get into a time trouble, you are a toast!", was my final advice.

Ivanchuk didn't get into time trouble, yet he was gradually outplayed and eventually lost the game:

After the game, he accused me of giving him very bad advice. "I played too fast, and that's why I lost," he said. One way or another, the tournament was practically decided at that point. Nevertheless, in the last round at some point, I had a theoretical chance to catch Anand. He was losing against GM Gad Rechlis from Israel. Ivanchuk offered a draw to GM Pavel Blatny, and I had a very promising attack against GM Simen Agdestein (the future coach of Magnus Carlsen). For a couple of minutes, my thoughts were occupied with math: If Anand loses, Blatny agrees a draw, and I win, there would be a three-way tie for first, and since we all played top players, who knows who would have a better tie break? Pretty soon I got a blunt dose of reality: Anand survived, Blatny rejected Ivanchuk's draw offer and lost, and my beautiful-looking attack unexpectedly fizzled out. As a result, Anand became the new World Junior Champion, Ivanchuk was second, and I got the bronze medal. Unfortunately, I missed a historic chance to appear in the same picture as Anand, which I mentioned in my old article.

Can you play like Vishy Anand?

Try our Play Like Vishy Anand course featuring five of Anand's best games!

While I was pretty happy about my result being just slightly behind these two geniuses, Ivanchuk was disappointed by his performance. The loss against Anand clearly bothered him. To make things worse, the very next year he lost a beautiful miniature to Anand. Can you find Black's final shot?

The next duel between these two superstars took place in the famous Linares tournament. That was probably Ivanchuk's best performance ever. Not only did he convincingly win the super tournament, but he also beat the world champion, Kasparov. Anand was one of numerous Ivanchuk's victims. Find a textbook break that demolished White's position.

By that time the whole chess world was well aware of the unique talent of both players, and therefore a match between Anand and Ivanchuk took place next year in Linares. It was another major disappointment for Ivanchuk. Not only did he lose the match, but the quality of Anand's play was also better. The next game is a true strategic masterpiece. Can you find a remarkable sequence of Black moves?

That's simply unbelievable! Black broke all known positional rules: He damaged his kingside pawn structure, gave White an outside passed h-pawn, and traded his "good" bishop for his opponent's "bad" bishop. Despite this, his grand plan came to fruition: He got his central passed pawns and won the game!

Many years after this match, Ivanchuk mentioned in one of his interviews that he sees every new game vs. Anand as a continuation of their match. I saw firsthand Ivanchuk's reaction after his loss to Anand in their first game. It seems to me that for Ivanchuk, every new game versus Anand is a continuation of their rivalry that started in 1987.

To be continued...

Read more:

A Match That Lasts The Whole Life: Anand vs Ivanchuk - Chess.com

Feb. 17, 2020, 9:30 AM UTC

Alexandra Botez was sitting in her apartment on a recent Friday in front of three computer monitors, a webcam and a microphone and losing at chess.

"This is not looking good, but this guy is not very fast," Botez said. "He's not good or fast, so hopefully we're going to win this game."

Botez, 24, is good and fast. She holds the title of Woman FIDE Master, was the first female president of the Stanford University Chess Club and remains one of the best players in Canada. And under normal circumstances, she probably wouldn't be losing to her anonymous online opponent.

But on the monitor to her right, Botez was also talking to more than 1,000 viewers who were watching the game as she offered a mix of live commentary, trash talk and thanks to the viewers who had given her contributions.

Players like Botez now serve as some of the most visible ambassadors of chess and, it can be argued, the game's first entertainers. If chess hustling turned pro, it would look something like what Botez does.

Botez, who said she used to enjoy hustling people when she was an 8-year-old chess phenom, now punishes most of her opponents online, sans the gambling. But she's not perfect.

In this game, she's down some material chess shorthand for having fewer pieces but her opponent had less than 30 seconds left on his clock.

"Let's hope we can flag this guy," she said, meaning her opponent would run out of time. He didn't, and she ended up checkmated.

Seconds later, she was starting a new game against a new opponent. Such is the life of a full-time chess livestreamer.

About six days a week, Botez sits in front of these monitors to play chess and interact with people on the internet. She's part of a growing scene of chess players who have followed in the footsteps of people who livestream themselves playing popular video games such as "Fortnite" or "League of Legends." While competitive esports has become a lucrative and growing market, popular personalities such as Tyler Blevins (better known as Ninja) who stream themselves playing games are among the market's biggest stars.

And while chess is far smaller as an esport than video games, it has grown quickly. On Twitch, the most popular internet platform to livestream esports, time spent watching chess has risen by more than 500 percent since 2016, according to data from the company. With that consumption has come some money, mostly donations from viewers facilitated by Twitch but also in sponsorship dollars.

That growth persuaded Botez in September to try livestreaming chess full time. She now has more than 60,000 followers on Twitch.

And while streaming is offering players like Botez a new way to make a living from their chess skills, it's also giving new life to one of the oldest games in the world.

"It's crazy to me to have this kind of support and this kind of viewership online for chess," Botez said. "Chess has always been a passion of mine, but it was never something that was popular. It was never something I would have imagined would have grown to what it is today."

Chess came to the attention of Twitch less than four years ago, when the company formed a partnership with Chess.com, the largest chess website, with almost 33 million members.

"Across all the different various competitive games on Twitch, chess has seen some of the most substantial growth in the same period of time than any other esport in the world," said Justin Dellario, Twitch's vice president of global esports.

The rise of esports both in terms of competitive gaming and more social online gaming first gained attention in the 1990s and the early 2000s before emerging in the past 10 years. The gaming and esports market research company Newzoo forecast that 2019 esports revenues would hit $1.1 billion. Twitch is by far the largest esports platform.

Chess hasn't enjoyed similar growth. While the game has a young, marketable genius in world champion Magnus Carlsen, it has struggled to attract the kind of money that can help sustain its growth.

"There have been times, even historically, where a world championship hasn't even been held because there wasn't enough sponsorship money," said Nick Barton, director of business development for Chess.com.

Get breaking news and insider analysis on the rapidly changing world of media and technology right to your inbox.

Chessbrah is the first company built around chess streaming. Grandmaster Eric Hansen, 27, first used the term "Chessbrah" in 2015 as an online alias, and later he streamed under the name. He's credited with being one of the first people to make chess streaming its own niche esport. Chessbrah now has almost 100,000 followers on Twitch.

"I grew up watching wrestling and reality shows," Hansen said. "And that actually was a big influence."

He built up his own channel and recruited other chess players to help. Chessbrah now has six full-time programmers for its Twitch and YouTube channels. It sells hoodies, T-shirts and hats on its website, encouraging people to "join the new chess culture."

Download the NBC News app for breaking news

Hansen said he sees a lot of upside for chess. He pointed to its history, its global reach and the notion that people don't need expensive computers to play it.

And many streamers aren't grandmasters like Hansen. Some are novices who are learning along with their audiences, Dellario said. He pointed to GoldDustTori, who has streamed for more than a year and started boosting her rating by more than 600 points.

While streaming isn't bringing in enough money to change the economics of the game, the prospect of streamers' attracting more people to the game and providing a way to engage with it more often could open the door to more sponsorship money, which has generally been hard to capture.

And some major chess tournaments have shown the potential to turn into major events. Twitch said the 2018 World Chess Championship attracted 4.4 million unique viewers.

The emergence of chess as an esport has also meant new avenues for players who might have otherwise moved on from the game. Botez is a prime example.

Chess players, particularly young ones who play the game at a high level, can end up burned out. Botez remembered asking her teachers to lie to her middle school classmates when she went to play in the North American championships because she was worried about fitting in. There were the hours of intense studying before big matches and the deflation after a disappointing performance. There was the tournament win that came with a college scholarship, an experience grueling enough to push her to take a break from the game.

And she never planned on turning pro.

"It wasn't fun anymore," Botez said.

Her story is a familiar one in the chess world that of an extremely talented player who may not make it to the top echelons of the game where players can make a living. Aside from teaching, there aren't many ways to make money playing chess. And there wasn't much for a casual or even semi-serious chess player to enjoy.

Even for a player of Botez's caliber, watching high-end chess games and commentary can be excruciatingly boring. Most competitive chess is played with long time allowances. Matches often last hours and end in draws.

"The broadcasts were super technical and so boring," Botez said. "I hated it."

Botez started streaming in college. It reminded her of some of her fondest memories of playing chess after tournaments were over or between rounds when players crowded around boards as people played blitz and bullet (variations of chess in which time limits are restricted to 10 minutes for each side or less) and talked some trash.

Some of her most notable livestreamed matches and most entertaining trash talk have come against grandmaster Ben Finegold. Botez grew up playing chess on the internet, but Finegold grew up playing "over the board," as real-world chess is known.

The son of a chess master, Finegold, 50, started playing competitively as the wave of attention that the American champion Bobby Fischer brought to the game in the early 1970s began to crest.

"It didn't take off after that as much as it should have," Finegold said. "Now, things are changing with the world of the internet and the fact that the U.S. is actually quite strong at chess."

Finegold climbed the ranks to become one of the top U.S. players from the 1990s through the 2010s. He became a grandmaster, the highest title given by the World Chess Federation, in 2010.

During that time, chess began to move online. The internet provided a way for people to play from the comfort of their homes against people around the world. The first internet chess server was set up in 1992, eventually becoming the Internet Chess Club, which is still in operation. Since then, numerous chess websites have sprung up, including Chess.com, Lichess and Chess24.

The vast majority of chess is now played online, Finegold said.

The introduction of video platforms also opened the door for more chess content to move online. Finegold taught at the Saint Louis Chess Club in the early 2010s, and the club began uploading his videos to YouTube.

Now, Finegold streams himself playing chess five to six times a week. His commentary usually includes a near-constant run of jokes, some of which poke fun at the peculiarities of online chess.

While Finegold grew up playing live chess in games that could often last for hours, most of his online games last less than 10 minutes. That means players, needing to move faster, often deviate from well-studied lines of play, known as theory.

"Still theory," Finegold will joke when launching a particularly bizarre series of moves that would never work in a longer game. (This is quite funny to chess enthusiasts.)

Winning is still paramount. When Botez streams, her competitiveness is evident and her tone can often match how she's playing. But livestreamed chess also brings a certain levity to mistakes.

Botez is particularly known in the chess world for the Botez Gambit. While many players have particular strategies (often called gambits) associated with their names, Botez's is unique. The Botez Gambit is now chess shorthand for accidentally losing one's queen, an often fatal error in a chess game.

It's something she's embraced. She's even got a compilation of Botez Gambits on YouTube.

It's an internet sensibility that might have been hard to imagine just a few years ago.

"It's OK if you make mistakes," she said. "Just move on in and have some fun with it."

And that's a feeling that isn't confined to the new guard. Finegold said he's looking forward to where streaming is going.

"Chess could be fun, too," Finegold said. "It doesn't have to be super serious all the time."

CORRECTION (Feb. 17, 2020, 10:42 a.m. ET): A previous version of this article misstated when Ben Finegold became a grandmaster. He achieved the title in 2010, not 2002.

See the original post here:

Fast-and-loose culture of esports is upending once staid world of chess - NBC News

By

RODNEY MUHUMUZA Associated Press

February 16, 2020, 4:10 PM

2 min read

KAMPALA, Uganda -- A Ugandan student who played a memorable role in a 2016 Disney film about a local chess prodigy has died at the age of 15.

Nikita Pearl Waligwa died on Saturday at a hospital near the Ugandan capital, Kampala. The cause was a brain tumor, according to the girls' secondary school she had attended since 2018.

She was "a darling to many, Gayaza High School said on .

Local media reported that Waligwa had been in and out of hospital with a recurring brain tumor and had previously received treatment, including surgery, in India.

Tributes were coming in for her on social media as Ugandans expressed sadness and recalled her role in the 2016 movie directed by Mira Nair and filmed in Kampala.

Queen of Katwe follows the rise of Ugandan chess prodigy Phiona Mutesi as a chess player amid grinding poverty in the Kampala slum of Katwe, with her single mother barely able to support her and her two siblings. Mutesi falls under the spell of an unassuming chess teacher who encourages the teenager to learn the game despite the skepticism of her mother, who warns her not to dream big because you will be disappointed.

The film was received favorably in Uganda, where young people with no acting experience shared the limelight with stars like Academy Award winner Lupita Nyongo. One of those Ugandans was Waligwa, who played Gloria, a chess player younger than Phiona who memorably said in the movie that in the game of chess the small one can become the big one.

Top Stories

Young Ugandan who featured in a Disney chess film dies at 15

Feb 16, 4:10 PM

Woman Calls Trump a 'Racist' in New Hampshire Diner

Jan 12, 3:35 PM

Barr blasts Trump's tweets: 'Impossible for me to do my job': ABC News Exclusive

Feb 13, 11:11 PM

Driver complained of autopilot issue before fatal Tesla crash: NTSB

Feb 12, 6:16 PM

Transcript of Attorney General Bill Barr's exclusive interview with ABC News

Feb 14, 2:40 AM

More here:

Young Ugandan who featured in a Disney chess film dies at 15 - ABC News

Young Chess Maestros from Soweto just came from representing the country in the nationals just a few weeks ago and one of them will still go further to play chess against the greatest minds in the world as she is going to play in an International Chess Tournament.

The thrilled coach Linda Makhubela expressed gratitude to the parents and guardians who have been hands-on in supporting the children participate in the classy and elegant game of chess, the chess club that meets in Diepkloof and Pimville has been diligent in participating in the game that is rarely played.

Knight Riders Chess Club (KRCC) went to play at the nationals against all the young great thinkers from the nation and coach Linda was excited and happy with his clubs performance and the resilient and determined spirit the children in his club bear.

[also read] Orlando Piratess Lorch finding his form

Makhubela said, I am so proud of the young ones in the club because they never let their spirit get damp because of being short of resources sometimes, whenever we go out to play, we try to take our A-game even though we often dont have that much support, we always strive to positively represent our country and our people.

The five-year-old Nokukhanya Chauke may be very young and tender, however, players in the chess fraternity already notice her as she will be representing South Africa for various upcoming chess tournaments.

Nosipho Chauke, Nokukhanya Chauke, and Noluthando Ntshalintshali.

Makhubela said, We are so happy for Nokukhanya and we know and trust that she will not disappoint us.

The coach further went to exclaim how his club also has a few kids who have qualified for the South African Junior Closed Championships.

Follow Us Here:

Catch the latest news by visiting our other platforms:

Here is the original post:

Soweto young Chess maestro to compete in an International Chess Tournament - Soweto Urban

Indian Grandmaster Vidit Gujrathi maintained a one-point lead after settling for a draw against Nikita Vitiugov of Russia in the sixth round of the Prague Chess Festivals Masters category.

He has 4.5 points and is ahead of Vitiugov and top seed Jan-Krzysztof Duda of Poland, both on 3.5 points.

The 25-year-old India No 2 opted for a London opening in his game against the Russian GM and had to sign the peace treaty in 39 moves late on Tuesday.

Gujrathis compatriot Pentala Harikrishna had to be content with his fifth draw in six games, against lower-rated Spanish GM David Anton Guijjaro.

Harikrishna, who chose a Catalan opening against Guijjaro, shared the point in 30 moves. The India no.3 now has 2.5 points after the conclusion of six rounds.

Gujrathi and Harikrishna will meet in an interesting clash in the seventh round later on Wednesday.

All the five games in the sixth round ended in draws with American Sam Shankland and Markus Ragger (Austria) being involved in a 76-move marathon.

Results of Round 6:

P Harikrishna (IND) 2.5 drew with David Anton Guijjaro (SPA) 3; Nikita Vitiugov (RUS) 2.5 drew with Vidit Gujrathi (IND) 4.5; Alirez Firouzja (Iran) 3 drew with David Navara (CZE) 2.5; Markus Ragger (AUT) 2.5 drew with Sam Shankland (USA) 2.5; Jan-Krzysztof Duda (POL) 3.5 drew with Nils Grandelius (SWE) 2.5.

See the rest here:

Chess: Indias Vidit Gujrathi draws sixth-round game to stay on top at Prague Masters - Scroll.in

Have you ever lost a winning position in time-pressure? I am sure the answer is a resounding yes! Every chess player has lost winning or equal positions in their games due to time trouble.

Imagine a situation:

Does this story sound familiar to you? If this happens once in a while, maybe its not that big an issue but if it happens game after game then it is high time to do something about it. Unless, of course, you enjoy playing under time pressure and find reasonably good moves without too many errors even in the most complicated of the positions. If this is the case, then, congratulations! You are the next Grischuk!

Alexander Grischuk the time trouble specialist | Photo: Grand Chess Tour

On a quick note, the above-mentioned situations are not fictional, it happened with me when I was a young upcoming player. Well not just once, many times!

In the book secrets of practical chess, John Nunn writes:

The clock is just as much a part of the game as the board and pieces and losing because of time-trouble is no different than losing because of weak play its still zero point on the scoresheet.

Remember, the clock is a very important part of the game nearly as important as the position on the board!

Getting into time trouble in every game is a serious sin and I committed this sin many times in my childhood. Back then I was not self-reliant enough to resolve this problem in detail. But in my journey towards excellence as a player and a coach, I read a lot of books and that helped me to understand many things on how to avoid time trouble. To be honest even today I still find myself in this situation in a few games but the percentage has gone down drastically.

Before finding a cure to any problem its first important to understand the problem. So why do players get into time pressure regularly after all? Dont they know getting into time pressure is bad for practical results?

We all know but it becomes a habit unknowingly. A habit which is difficult to break but is not impossible. If I can do it so can you.

Let us see a short video clip (watch the first 2 mins 20) of one of the fastest chess players in the world right now Ian Nepo who shares his story of how he improved his time trouble problem which he faced in his childhood.

Ian Nepomniachtchi on how he solved the time pressure issue

Nepomniachtchi:

When I was 10 or 11years old, I used to have time trouble in every game. At some point mycoach told me that you playas if you have one hour instead of two hours on the clock! (laughs) In the end it worked! There is also a funny story of Grischukplaying against Malakhov.The game began at around 6 p.m. and Malakhov had his last train back to Moscow at 8 p.m.! So while Grischuk thought for his moves and played, Malakhov was simply rushing. He had only 10 minutes for his game!

Asyou can see from Nepo's examples sometimes you have totry and bringabout the change, sometimes the outside factors force you to play faster!

Assuming every position as criticalI feel the major reason why players get into regular time-pressure is that they assume every decision that they make throughout the game is equally important. This is not the case. The decisions they make in the critical moments in the game, are far more imperative than the decision they make in the positions where there are several alternatives of more or less equal strength.

Self-doubtSometimes we intuitively feel that a certain move must be good because position demands it! But in order to prove ourselves right (because we are afraid of missing something even better), we calculate and calculate and calculate! After a while, we end up playing the same move but after losing unnecessary time on the clock.

Playing perfect chess Some of us want to create a masterpiece, play a perfect game of chess. Such games rarely exist! Even in top-level games, there will be some inaccuracies here and there. If you spend time finding perfect moves from the early stages of the game, you may end up playing horrible moves towards the end due to shortage of time.

ProcrastinationSome players do not make decisions, not only in chess but also in real life, until they are forced to by external circumstances. This results in a delay of simple decision making process over the board because there is no pressure until of course, the time-pressure arrives!

Bad opening preparationYou may lose a lot of time in the opening phase of the game itself if you have no idea how to continue after 7-8 moves into the game. Figuring out everything from the very start creates pressure and in return you lose a lot of time which may be difficult to cover later on.

Lack of concentration Some players may suffer setbacks due to a lack of concentration during the game. Their mind is flooded with sometimes unrelated thoughts/ideas which distract them from focusing. The result loss of valuable time.

So once we have understood the reasons of time pressure lets dive into the solutions to overcome this.

1. Understanding the critical moments in the gameBasically spending the right amount of time and energy is a mark a strong practical player. On the surface, such players may not look like playing the best moves every time. But they will find accurate moves when important moments of the game come. Of course, finding accurate moves also depends on the strength of a player but they are able to find simply because they have time to think when it matters! How to identify which moments are critical and which are not, is an entirely different topic and I will cover this topic in future articles.

World-famous chess author and coach Jacob Aagaard has written an insightful chapter on decision making in his amazing bookThinking inside the box. You can refer to this book to know more about critical moments in the game.

2. Dont doubt yourself on every decision Stop doubting every move you play. Your intuition always has insights to offer in any given position. Trust them more often, except in positions where accuracy is the key!

3. There is rarely a perfect game of ChessSpending loads of time on every move to find a perfect one is like driving a car in the second gear to avoid even the slightest of bumps on the road. If you play in the second gear from the start and when suddenly you feel the time pressure, you anxiously switch to the top gears and that is exactly where you drive into the unknown territory. Always aim for perfection in the critical moments of the game, not when simple decisions have to be made. Go ahead and play the moves that seem logical and obvious to you.

4. Dont wait for outer reasons to force youPlayers suffering from delaying decisions on the board for no apparent reason should examine if they do the same in other matters of their day to day lives. Many times our character reflects in our play in chess. Practise taking simple decisions faster in your daily life and it may help you in taking decisions faster on the board.

5. Improve your opening knowledgeIf you find yourself thinking from the very early stages of the game you need to improve your opening preparations. When you already know the opening lines inside out, you automatically play faster and better moves thus saving a lot of time on the clock for the future.

6. Meditate if you have problems with concentration If you face problems in concentrating during the game, it makes sense to work on this weakness on a daily basis. There are many ways to improve your concentration. Meditation is an ageless, proven way of doing it. Focusing on your breathing during the game can also be helpful. I will go in detail about this in future articles.

My last two suggestions are specifically for ambitious players. I have personally used these in my playing career too and also recommend my students who are facing issues related to time-trouble.

1. Use your opponents time Most of the players have the habit of getting up from the board after playing the move and roaming around the hall. If the position is complicated and you have not yet figured out what reply you will make on some of the opponent's most obvious moves, then it is better you stay on the board and use your opponents time to calculate and figure things out. By this way, you will already have a lot of information about the position when the opponent actually makes his move as you have already calculated at least a few variations in your opponents time.

2. Record time after each move This is a very important thing that you can do to improve your time-management during the game. After the first 5-6 moves are over, record the time shown on your and your opponents clock after each move on your scoresheet. In this way, you will get an idea of how much time you spent on each move. Keep the scoresheets safely or take a picture of your scoresheet and after the tournament, once you are back home, you can discuss with your coach or think for yourself why did you spend so much time on this particular move. You will get a lot of insights into your thinking process during the game. This habit has helped me a lot in improving my time-management and I have seen other friends of mine who are now world-class players use this method as well.

Once you have noted down the time for yourmoves on your scoresheet during the game, it is a good idea to store them in ChessBase after the game as well.

When you open a board in ChessBase 15, you go to "Home" and then click on "Input Mode

Click on "Move Time"

Put the amount of time you took for a move.

Say for the first move 1.e4, youtook two minutes during the game.

It comes like thisright next to the move in the notation and can be a useful reference point

You can start using the feature if you already use ChessBase 15.

ChessBase 15 - Starter Package

The entry into the chess cosmos. ChessBase 15 program + new Big Database 2019 (7.6 million uncommented games). Plus 3 issues ChessBase Magazine and CB Premium membership for 6 months!

The truth is, in spite of doing all of this, you will still find yourself in time-pressure every now and then. So...

Relax calm down This is easy to say but difficult to apply. But if you get tensed in time-pressure then there is a strong chance that you may miss something. Tell yourself to relax and focus on the game.

Be tactically alert Most of the misses in time-trouble are usually of tactical nature. Be tactically aware and be ready for some quick calculations. It would be great if you train your tactical vision and quick calculation skills at home.

It could be one reason or a combination of two or more reasons that results in a habit of time pressure. The journey to turn it around into a good habit starts with first acknowledging that time pressure is bad for our practical results and second to take firm steps to resolve this problem once and for all. It would be very naive to expect that after reading this article or after taking steps you would never come into time-pressure again. Habits good or bad once formed take time to be changed. It is important to be patient and trust your abilities to overcome it.

You may try to play faster but make bad decisions in a game or two, get into a worse position and lose the game in the end. But that is OK. When you try to change something that has become your second nature (in this case playing slowly in every game) results never come as quickly as we expect them to. When you lose games by playing faster, remember that this is a just a step-back in your journey towards your goal. Remind yourself how many games you have lost by blundering or missing moves in time-pressure. A better way to look at your mistakes when you play faster is to investigate why you played that bad move, how can you improve your understanding of that position so that you can make better moves in similar positions rather than trying to go back to your old ways of playing very slowly.

I hope this article has helped you to understand the issue of time-trouble and gave you insights as to what are the steps you can take to improve this bad habit of time-pressure.

Good luck!

See the rest here:

Grandmaster tips on how to fight time-pressure - Chessbase News