According to an op-ed by a University of TexasAustin student, modern veganism is too focused on rich, white-people vegans, and it needs to become more intersectional and inclusive.

In an article titled Vegans must feed everyone, not just wealthy white people, Audrey Larcher opens by explaining that the modern image of a vegan is some hipster who is probably slender and definitely white and thats a major, major problem.

The caricature is indicative of underlying problems in the vegan community, Larcher continues. White veganism which refers to the dominant cruelty-free culture of wealth, privilege and exclusivity is not an option for most people.

If vegans want to promote sustainable and compassionate diets for the world, their communities must be intersectional, she continues.

For example, Larcher explains that people from many other cultures namely Indian, Ethiopian, and East Asian cultures have a lot of dishes that are plant-based or dont use dairy, and its a big problem that white vegans never talk about these cultures or their plant-based foods.

Instead of promoting the foods of foreign cultures, vegans go great lengths to reinvent traditional foods which rely on animal products to taste good, she explains.

According to Larcher, things like the vegan imitation-cheese industry are problematic because a lot of their products and the grocery stores that sell them are expensive, and thats an example of cultural exclusivity.

Being a white, American imitation-cheese-eating vegan definitely is a certain culture (I almost left it at cult) of its own, and one that certainly is available only to people with a certain means. But everything in the world is like that. For example, rich people also pay a ton of money to take spin classes at SoulCycle instead of just going for a run, and that, too is a culture (cult!) of its own. Take any diet or interest in the world, and there is automatically going to be some sort of high-end, snobby version of it where the prices are high just because there are wealthy people out there who will pay them (and then talk with their wealthy friends about how, like, amazing their $34 candlelit spin class was and that they totally needed to go because they ate way too many $24 zucchini-and-cashew-cheese enchiladas at Candle 79 before seeing Hamilton for the fourth time on Friday night.)

Yes, of course this life isnt available to everyone. It isnt available to me. But that doesnt mean that not eating meat and cheese isnt available. The truth is, plenty of vegan staples beans, nuts, rice, and even produce are very affordable. Maybe shes saying that there just isnt enough information out there for people who are dying to be vegan but think they cant afford it? Because if you Google vegan on a budget, youll get more than 42 million results. Perhaps just perhaps! the main reason that more people arent vegan is because they just dont want to be vegan.

But, according to Larcher, the cultural exclusivity thing is only the tip of an insensitive iceberg.

Most vegan communities offer no sympathy to victims of racism, appropriating minorities struggles to advance their own cause, she explains, linking to a tweet from a popular vegan account that reads: Black lives matter...more than Chickens or Cows lives...apparently.

Of course, Larcher is correct in calling this insensitive. Its true, people who are vegans due to radical animal-rights beliefs think that its unfair that a human-centric movement like Black Lives Matter gets more attention than their chicken-and-cow-centric movement, because they think that human suffering and animal suffering are the same. Yes, I understand that their logic dictates that they would say this about any popular human-centric movement, but still, talking about black lives in this way is obviously offensive. And there really is no image more vomit-inducing than a rich, white, hipster vegan tweeting little jabs at Black Lives Matter while he strolls through the farmers market on his iPhone.

According to Larcher, this kind of rhetoric can alienate potential vegans, and it shows a need for all vegans to unite behind a sensitive message in order to recruit more people. Now, just like Im not sure how many people are being turned off of veganism by cashew cheese prices, Im also sure how many are being turned off by the radical animal-rights rhetoric, but in a sense, shes right. Seeing something so inflammatory attributed to the movement certainly does show that the movement could benefit from avoiding that, getting together, and rallying around something more sensitive but it also shows why thats going to be impossible.

Clearly, things like that Black Lives Matter tweet dont represent all vegans but the truth is, nothing really does. People are vegan for so many different reasons. Some people are vegan for health benefits, some people are vegan because they heard both Miley Cyrus and her pig are vegan, some people are vegan because their rich friends are vegan, and some people are vegan because they think that chickens are slaves. Its going to be impossible for a group where some people are participating because they just think its healthier but dont think that animals are the same as people and some people are participating because they dont care if its healthier they just do think animals are the same as people to have a united voice. Think about it: A person who really believes that chickens are slaves is not going to just chill out and stop talking about it, because they believe that chickens are slaves. And a person who eats a plant-based diet because she thinks it helps with her acne or whatever is not going to declare solidarity with a person who thinks chickens are slaves because that person believes that chickens are slaves.

An anti-chicken-slavery advocate just isnt going to be able to fit into a group if its criteria demands that he stop talking about chicken like theyre enslaved. Despite Larchers best efforts and op-eds, its going to be impossible to have any kind of united voice for a movement when the movement has so many different and passionate sects especially considering that the only thing harder than getting a chicken-slave advocate to shut up about speciesism is getting a Whole Foodsadvocate to shut up about how their vegan coconut bacon tastes just like the real thing.

Katherine Timpf is a reporter for National Review Online.

READ MORE:

Read more:

College Op-Ed: We Have to Make Veganism 'Intersectional' - National Review